Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 1, point u — part 4

Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women

Vote
Paragraph 1, point u — part 4
Decision
No. 7 of the sitting of 12 Feb 2026
Result
351 for · 141 against · 68 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
12 February 2026, 12:36
More facts (6)
Position
vote 35 of 77 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens · split vote: EPP, Patriots
Official label
A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point u/4
Text
Report A-10-2026-0010
Dossier
2025/2240(INI)
Vote id
184828
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 351 for, 141 against, 68 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 63 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “second ‘R’ in ‘SRHR’ (second occurrence)”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 36Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 42Against 0Abst. 0No vote 11 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 106Against 0Abst. 1No vote 29 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 60Against 0Abst. 0No vote 15 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 84Against 24Abst. 27No vote 52 of 187Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.43
ECRFor 5Against 50Abst. 7No vote 17 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.71
PatriotsFor 6Against 33Abst. 31No vote 14 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.21
ESNFor 0Against 24Abst. 0No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 12Against 10Abst. 2No vote 8 of 32Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium300
Bulgaria300
Cyprus100
Czechia301
Germany1822
Denmark200
Estonia100
Spain3410
Finland200
France211
Greece100
Croatia041
Ireland400
Italy213
Lithuania020
Luxembourg200
Latvia200
Malta020
Netherlands420
Poland1506
Portugal312
Romania601
Sweden400
Slovenia140
Slovakia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 560 members

No vote recorded, 159

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 159 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Recital M — part 2 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Split vote379 for, 134 against, 80 abstained Adopted For 64 %Requested by Renew, S&Dr · shared0.92 484 voters
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 85 — part 2 Impact of social media and the online environment on young peopleSplit vote403 for, 146 against, 50 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.91 480 voters
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 63 — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSplit vote429 for, 153 against, 69 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.91 506 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Paragraph 71 — part 3 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Split vote368 for, 147 against, 93 abstained Adopted For 61 %Requested by Renew, S&Dr · shared0.91 495 voters
13 Nov 2025Paragraph 72 — part 2 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Split vote365 for, 149 against, 73 abstained Adopted For 62 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.91 483 voters
13 Nov 2025Paragraph 79 — part 3 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Split vote359 for, 167 against, 68 abstained Adopted For 60 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.90 484 voters
9 Jul 2025Paragraph 37 — part 6 Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political ForumSplit vote431 for, 195 against, 41 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.90 525 voters
13 Nov 2025Paragraph 87 — part 2 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Split vote362 for, 163 against, 62 abstained Adopted For 62 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.90 478 voters
13 Nov 2025Recital D — part 2 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Split vote347 for, 170 against, 61 abstained Adopted For 60 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.90 472 voters
9 Jul 2025Paragraph 37 — part 5 Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political ForumSplit vote435 for, 190 against, 39 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.90 521 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184828
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 1, point u — part 4 — Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women”. Vote, 12 February 2026. votingId 184828, reference 2025/2240(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184828 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-02-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-02-12-184828,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 1, point u — part 4 — Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-02-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184828}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184828},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 184828, reference 2025/2240(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}