Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 1, point s — part 2

Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women

Vote
Paragraph 1, point s — part 2
Result
182 for · 369 against · 12 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
12 February 2026, 12:35
More facts (6)
Position
vote 31 of 77 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D · split vote: S&D
Official label
A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point s/2
Vote id
184823
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 182 for, 369 against, 12 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 32 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “that word”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 1Against 35Abst. 0No vote 10 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
GreensFor 4Against 38Abst. 0No vote 11 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.86
S&DFor 4Against 103Abst. 0No vote 29 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
RenewFor 9Against 53Abst. 0No vote 13 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.78
EPPFor 128Against 6Abst. 3No vote 50 of 187Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.90
ECRFor 9Against 51Abst. 1No vote 18 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.75
PatriotsFor 23Against 46Abst. 0No vote 15 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.50
ESNFor 0Against 25Abst. 0No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 4Against 12Abst. 8No vote 8 of 32Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria010
Czechia120
Germany016
Spain010
France100
Greece022
Italy010
Luxembourg010
Romania020
Slovakia210

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 563 members

No vote recorded, 156

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 156 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
28 Apr 2026Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 7 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUAmendment223 for, 343 against, 86 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by S&D, Renewr · shared0.63 521 voters
9 Oct 2025Paragraph 27 — part 2 United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructureSplit vote233 for, 272 against, 104 abstained Rejected For 38 %r · shared0.62 492 voters
20 Jan 2026Amendment 1 to recital A Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economiesAmendment288 for, 294 against, 63 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.62 524 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
24 Feb 2026Amendment 22, adding text after paragraph 5 Four years of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for UkraineAmendment272 for, 243 against, 66 abstained Adopted For 47 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.62 474 voters
3 Apr 2025Amendment 15 to paragraph 6 — part 1 Energy-intensive industriesAmendment282 for, 309 against, 24 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by Members, Greensr · shared0.61 501 voters
24 Feb 2026Amendment 20, adding text after recital F Four years of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for UkraineAmendment263 for, 273 against, 50 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.60 479 voters
28 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2024Final231 for, 389 against, 33 abstained Rejected For 35 %r · shared0.60 520 voters
12 Mar 2026Final vote — text as a whole Activities of the European Ombudsman – annual report 2024Final233 for, 250 against, 76 abstained Rejected For 42 %r · shared0.60 471 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 2 to paragraph 47 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Court of AuditorsAmendment259 for, 325 against, 77 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.59 518 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 86 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment271 for, 264 against, 106 abstained Adopted For 42 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.59 514 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
26 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 1, point s — part 2 — Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women”. Vote, 12 February 2026. votingId 184823, reference 2025/2240(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184823 (retrieved 26 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-02-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-02-12-184823,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 1, point s — part 2 — Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-02-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184823}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184823},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 184823, reference 2025/2240(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}