Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 1, point s — part 1

Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women

Vote
Paragraph 1, point s — part 1
Result
392 for · 153 against · 18 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
12 February 2026, 12:35
More facts (6)
Position
vote 30 of 77 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D · split vote: S&D
Official label
A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point s/1
Vote id
184822
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 392 for, 153 against, 18 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 70 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the word: ‘relevant’”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 34Against 2Abst. 0No vote 10 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.92
GreensFor 41Against 0Abst. 0No vote 12 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 105Against 2Abst. 0No vote 29 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
RenewFor 50Against 11Abst. 1No vote 13 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.71
EPPFor 123Against 6Abst. 7No vote 51 of 187Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.86
ECRFor 2Against 59Abst. 1No vote 17 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
PatriotsFor 25Against 39Abst. 6No vote 14 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.34
ESNFor 0Against 25Abst. 0No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 12Against 9Abst. 3No vote 8 of 32Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria050
Belgium020
Czechia016
Denmark010
Spain060
France2300
Hungary090
Italy250
Latvia010
Netherlands060
Poland020
Portugal010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 563 members

No vote recorded, 156

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 156 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
30 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Women’s entrepreneurship in rural and island areas and outermost regionsFinal404 for, 102 against, 67 abstained Adopted For 71 %r · shared0.88 466 voters
9 Sept 2025Recital E — part 3 of 3 Public procurementSplit vote481 for, 157 against, 4 abstained Adopted For 75 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.86 500 voters
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 57 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Separate vote405 for, 176 against, 49 abstained Adopted For 64 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.85 510 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
28 Apr 2026Paragraph 28 — part 1 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUSplit vote491 for, 111 against, 51 abstained Adopted For 75 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.84 520 voters
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 62 — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSplit vote446 for, 138 against, 59 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.84 499 voters
20 Jan 2026Final vote — text as a whole Humanitarian aid in a time of polycrisis – reaffirming our principles for a more effective and ambitious response to humanitarian crisesFinal444 for, 153 against, 55 abstained Adopted For 68 %r · shared0.84 528 voters
28 Apr 2026Paragraph 21 — part 1 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUSplit vote444 for, 152 against, 54 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.84 518 voters
19 Sept 2024Separate vote on recital C The devastating floods in central and eastern Europe, the loss of lives and the EU’s preparedness to act on such disasters exacerbated by climate changeSeparate vote456 for, 112 against, 38 abstained Adopted For 75 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.83 491 voters
20 May 2026Paragraph 19 — part 2 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseSplit vote463 for, 151 against, 28 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.83 513 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 9 The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equalityAmendment489 for, 142 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 76 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.83 507 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 1, point s — part 1 — Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women”. Vote, 12 February 2026. votingId 184822, reference 2025/2240(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184822 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-02-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-02-12-184822,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 1, point s — part 1 — Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-02-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184822}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184822},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 184822, reference 2025/2240(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}