Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 1, point q — part 1

Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women

Vote
Paragraph 1, point q — part 1
Decision
No. 7 of the sitting of 12 Feb 2026
Result
373 for · 139 against · 53 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
12 February 2026, 12:34
More facts (6)
Position
vote 25 of 77 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D · split vote: EPP
Official label
A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point q/1
Text
Report A-10-2026-0010
Dossier
2025/2240(INI)
Vote id
184815
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 373 for, 139 against, 53 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 66 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘feminist and’”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 36Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 42Against 0Abst. 0No vote 11 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 108Against 0Abst. 0No vote 28 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 60Against 0Abst. 2No vote 13 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
EPPFor 119Against 8Abst. 10No vote 50 of 187Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.80
ECRFor 0Against 54Abst. 8No vote 17 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.81
PatriotsFor 0Against 41Abst. 28No vote 15 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.39
ESNFor 0Against 25Abst. 0No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 8Against 11Abst. 5No vote 8 of 32Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium200
Cyprus100
Germany400
Denmark100
Spain300
Finland200
France700
Greece100
Ireland300
Italy800
Netherlands100
Portugal200
Sweden100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 565 members

No vote recorded, 154

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 154 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
23 Oct 2025Separate vote on paragraph 3 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Separate vote383 for, 170 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.92 476 voters
20 May 2026Separate vote on citation 25 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseSeparate vote451 for, 145 against, 52 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.92 518 voters
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 96 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Separate vote413 for, 197 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.92 505 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
25 Nov 2025Recital BJ — part 2 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSplit vote410 for, 190 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.92 505 voters
25 Nov 2025Paragraph 27 — part 1 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSplit vote418 for, 183 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.91 505 voters
9 Jul 2025Separate vote on paragraph 47 Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political ForumSeparate vote449 for, 191 against, 28 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.91 530 voters
25 Nov 2025Recital BJ — part 1 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSplit vote413 for, 189 against, 32 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.91 507 voters
25 Nov 2025Recital BE — part 2 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSplit vote408 for, 209 against, 11 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.91 502 voters
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 61 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Separate vote416 for, 187 against, 27 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.91 512 voters
25 Nov 2025Recital BD — part 2 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSplit vote416 for, 202 against, 12 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.91 504 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184815
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
26 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 1, point q — part 1 — Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women”. Vote, 12 February 2026. votingId 184815, reference 2025/2240(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184815 (retrieved 26 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-02-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-02-12-184815,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 1, point q — part 1 — Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-02-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184815}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184815},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 184815, reference 2025/2240(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}