Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Separate vote: paragraph 1, point p

Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women

Vote
Separate vote: paragraph 1, point p
Decision
No. 7 of the sitting of 12 Feb 2026
Result
470 for · 62 against · 28 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
12 February 2026, 12:34
More facts (6)
Position
vote 24 of 77 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point p
Text
Report A-10-2026-0010
Dossier
2025/2240(INI)
Vote id
184813
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 470 for, 62 against, 28 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 84 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 36Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 41Against 0Abst. 0No vote 12 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 108Against 0Abst. 0No vote 28 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 61Against 0Abst. 0No vote 14 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 136Against 0Abst. 0No vote 51 of 187Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 48Against 9Abst. 2No vote 20 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.72
PatriotsFor 23Against 23Abst. 24No vote 14 of 84Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.01
ESNFor 0Against 25Abst. 0No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 17Against 5Abst. 2No vote 8 of 32Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria030
Czechia010
Germany0150
Hungary010
Poland030
Slovakia020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 560 members

No vote recorded, 159

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 159 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Oct 2025Paragraph 13 — part 1 Second World Summit for Social DevelopmentSplit vote479 for, 68 against, 64 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.86 487 voters
27 Nov 2025Paragraph 22 — part 2 Escalation of the war and the humanitarian catastrophe in SudanSplit vote478 for, 68 against, 45 abstained Adopted For 81 %r · shared0.86 481 voters
23 Oct 2025Paragraph 54 — part 1 Key objectives for the CITES COP20 meeting in UzbekistanSplit vote456 for, 68 against, 44 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.83 470 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Sept 2025Paragraph 63 — part 2 Public procurementSplit vote553 for, 82 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 85 %Requested by S&D, Patriotsr · shared0.82 504 voters
27 Nov 2024Final vote on the motion for a resolution Draft amending budget No 5/2024: adjustment in payment appropriations, update of revenues and other technical updatesFinal525 for, 75 against, 81 abstained Adopted For 77 %r · shared0.82 527 voters
11 Feb 2025Paragraph 32 — part 2 European Central Bank – annual report 2024Split vote494 for, 87 against, 45 abstained Adopted For 79 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.82 498 voters
23 Oct 2024Paragraph 78 — part 4 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sectionsSplit vote502 for, 68 against, 77 abstained Adopted For 78 %r · shared0.81 496 voters
15 Sept 2026Paragraph 32 — part 2 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldSplit vote482 for, 67 against, 121 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.80 523 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 8 — part 1 Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rightsSplit vote470 for, 64 against, 46 abstained Adopted For 81 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.80 559 voters
9 Oct 2025Paragraph 4 — part 1 Second World Summit for Social DevelopmentSplit vote478 for, 69 against, 65 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.80 489 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184813
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Separate vote: paragraph 1, point p — Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women”. Vote, 12 February 2026. votingId 184813, reference 2025/2240(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184813 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-02-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-02-12-184813,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Separate vote: paragraph 1, point p — Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-02-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184813}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184813},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 184813, reference 2025/2240(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}