Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 1, point n — part 2

Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women

Vote
Paragraph 1, point n — part 2
Decision
No. 7 of the sitting of 12 Feb 2026
Result
280 for · 265 against · 18 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
12 February 2026, 12:33
More facts (6)
Position
vote 22 of 77 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D · split vote: EPP
Official label
A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point n/2
Text
Report A-10-2026-0010
Dossier
2025/2240(INI)
Vote id
184811
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 280 for, 265 against, 18 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 50 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “those words”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 37Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 42Against 0Abst. 0No vote 11 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 107Against 0Abst. 0No vote 29 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 49Against 10Abst. 2No vote 14 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.70
EPPFor 17Against 112Abst. 7No vote 51 of 187Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.74
ECRFor 1Against 59Abst. 2No vote 17 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
PatriotsFor 23Against 46Abst. 0No vote 15 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.50
ESNFor 0Against 25Abst. 0No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 4Against 13Abst. 7No vote 8 of 32Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria010
Czechia030
Germany214
Spain010
France010
Greece112
Italy010
Luxembourg010
Romania020
Slovakia111

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 563 members

No vote recorded, 156

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 156 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 62 — part 3 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSplit vote325 for, 296 against, 33 abstained Adopted For 50 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.89 508 voters
21 May 2026Separate vote on paragraph 64 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapSeparate vote266 for, 234 against, 25 abstained Adopted For 51 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.87 434 voters
21 May 2026Paragraph 37 — part 2 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapSplit vote245 for, 275 against, 20 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by Members, S&Dr · shared0.86 447 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Dec 2025Separate vote on paragraph 7 European Citizens’ Initiative ‘My voice, my choice: for safe and accessible abortion’Separate vote315 for, 297 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 50 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.85 513 voters
21 May 2026Paragraph 37 — part 1 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapSplit vote286 for, 182 against, 65 abstained Adopted For 54 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.85 440 voters
17 Jun 2025Separate vote on paragraph 44 Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in SevilleSeparate vote280 for, 322 against, 62 abstained Rejected For 42 %Requested by S&D, Renewr · shared0.85 518 voters
13 Nov 2025Separate vote on recital Z Gender Equality Strategy 2025Separate vote293 for, 269 against, 42 abstained Adopted For 49 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.85 490 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 29, adding text after recital F Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAmendment291 for, 303 against, 50 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.85 517 voters
12 Feb 2026Amendment 10, adding text after recital AG Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategyAmendment265 for, 273 against, 42 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.84 560 voters
21 May 2026Recital S — part 2 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapSplit vote273 for, 160 against, 79 abstained Adopted For 53 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.84 421 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184811
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
26 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 1, point n — part 2 — Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women”. Vote, 12 February 2026. votingId 184811, reference 2025/2240(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184811 (retrieved 26 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-02-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-02-12-184811,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 1, point n — part 2 — Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-02-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184811}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184811},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 184811, reference 2025/2240(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}