Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 1, point k — part 1

Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women

Vote
Paragraph 1, point k — part 1
Decision
No. 7 of the sitting of 12 Feb 2026
Result
420 for · 88 against · 56 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
12 February 2026, 12:32
More facts (6)
Position
vote 18 of 77 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D · split vote: S&D
Official label
A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point k/1
Text
Report A-10-2026-0010
Dossier
2025/2240(INI)
Vote id
184807
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 420 for, 88 against, 56 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 74 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the word: ‘relevant’”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 37Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 40Against 2Abst. 0No vote 11 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
S&DFor 107Against 0Abst. 1No vote 28 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 57Against 4Abst. 0No vote 14 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.90
EPPFor 133Against 2Abst. 2No vote 50 of 187Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
ECRFor 2Against 13Abst. 46No vote 18 of 79Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.63
PatriotsFor 26Against 40Abst. 3No vote 15 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.37
ESNFor 1Against 24Abst. 0No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 17Against 3Abst. 4No vote 8 of 32Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria100
Belgium200
Czechia100
Germany1300
Denmark300
Spain220
Finland100
France300
Croatia100
Italy300
Lithuania100
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands400
Sweden300

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 564 members

No vote recorded, 155

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 155 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
30 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Women’s entrepreneurship in rural and island areas and outermost regionsFinal404 for, 102 against, 67 abstained Adopted For 71 %r · shared0.85 467 voters
11 Mar 2026Final vote — text as a whole Gender pay and pension gap in the EU: state of play, challenges and the way forward, and developing guidelines for the better evaluation and fairer remuneration of work in female-dominated sectorsFinal458 for, 72 against, 98 abstained Adopted For 73 %r · shared0.85 509 voters
9 Sept 2025Recital E — part 3 of 3 Public procurementSplit vote481 for, 157 against, 4 abstained Adopted For 75 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.84 502 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
28 Nov 2024Recital F — part 2 Georgia's worsening democratic crisis following the recent parliamentary elections and alleged electoral fraudSplit vote412 for, 120 against, 68 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.83 479 voters
9 Jul 2025Paragraph 56 — part 1 Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political ForumSplit vote488 for, 87 against, 112 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.83 537 voters
8 May 2025Separate vote on paragraph 17 Banking Union – annual report 2024Separate vote366 for, 77 against, 94 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.83 442 voters
28 Nov 2024Paragraph 10 — part 2 Georgia's worsening democratic crisis following the recent parliamentary elections and alleged electoral fraudSplit vote411 for, 121 against, 70 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.83 481 voters
17 Dec 2025Paragraph 25 — part 2 Digitalisation, artificial intelligence and algorithmic management in the workplace – shaping the future of workSplit vote486 for, 159 against, 12 abstained Adopted For 74 %r · shared0.82 529 voters
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 48 — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSplit vote409 for, 150 against, 79 abstained Adopted For 64 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.81 501 voters
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 112 — part 1 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportSplit vote498 for, 80 against, 57 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.80 512 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184807
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 1, point k — part 1 — Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women”. Vote, 12 February 2026. votingId 184807, reference 2025/2240(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184807 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-02-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-02-12-184807,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 1, point k — part 1 — Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-02-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184807}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184807},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 184807, reference 2025/2240(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}