Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 19 — part 1

Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights

Vote
Paragraph 19 — part 1
Result
447 for · 102 against · 30 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
12 February 2026, 12:27
More facts (6)
Position
vote 11 of 15 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D · split vote: Members
Official label
A10-0256/2025 – Johan Danielsson – § 19/1
Vote id
184755
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 447 for, 102 against, 30 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 77 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘Stresses the need for a minimum EU framework under which labour intermediaries operate in order to strengthen their accountability, transparency obligations and compliance with minimum requirements and quality standards, as stipulated by ILO Convention No 181 on Private Employment Agencies;’”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 39Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 43Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 110Against 0Abst. 0No vote 26 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 45Against 10Abst. 6No vote 14 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.61
EPPFor 143Against 1Abst. 0No vote 43 of 187Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 49Against 10Abst. 4No vote 16 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.67
PatriotsFor 0Against 54Abst. 16No vote 14 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.66
ESNFor 0Against 22Abst. 3No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.82
No groupFor 18Against 5Abst. 1No vote 8 of 32Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium300
Bulgaria300
Cyprus100
Czechia400
Germany2300
Denmark200
Estonia200
Spain1700
Finland200
France500
Greece600
Croatia410
Ireland400
Italy600
Lithuania200
Luxembourg200
Latvia200
Malta200
Netherlands600
Poland2100
Portugal600
Romania800
Sweden400
Slovenia500
Slovakia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 579 members

No vote recorded, 140

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 140 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
7 May 2025Final vote Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Court of Justice of the European UnionFinal541 for, 97 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 81 %r · shared0.88 533 voters
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 48 — part 4 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote485 for, 106 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.87 499 voters
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 29 — part 3 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote498 for, 97 against, 22 abstained Adopted For 81 %Requested by Patriots, EPP, S&Dr · shared0.87 510 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 29 — part 2 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote506 for, 88 against, 27 abstained Adopted For 81 %Requested by EPP, S&Dr · shared0.86 512 voters
7 May 2025Final vote Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European ParliamentFinal513 for, 119 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 79 %r · shared0.85 524 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 133 to Article 6 — part 1 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment505 for, 126 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.85 524 voters
7 May 2025Final vote Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Economic and Social CommitteeFinal538 for, 96 against, 27 abstained Adopted For 81 %r · shared0.84 531 voters
9 Oct 2025Paragraph 13 — part 1 Second World Summit for Social DevelopmentSplit vote479 for, 68 against, 64 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.84 501 voters
8 Jul 2025Paragraph 49 — part 3 Security of energy supply in the EUSplit vote535 for, 122 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.84 545 voters
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 3 — part 1 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote468 for, 123 against, 34 abstained Adopted For 75 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.84 514 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 19 — part 1 — Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights”. Vote, 12 February 2026. votingId 184755, reference 2025/2133(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184755 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-02-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-02-12-184755,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 19 — part 1 — Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-02-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184755}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184755},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 184755, reference 2025/2133(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}