Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 8 — part 1

Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights

Vote
Paragraph 8 — part 1
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 12 Feb 2026
Result
470 for · 64 against · 46 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
12 February 2026, 12:26
More facts (6)
Position
vote 5 of 15 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D · split vote: Members
Official label
A10-0256/2025 – Johan Danielsson – § 8/1
Text
Report A-10-2025-0256
Dossier
2025/2133(INI)
Vote id
184747
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 470 for, 64 against, 46 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 81 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘calls on the Commission to include relevant proposals favouring direct employment relationships in its upcoming quality jobs act;’”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 39Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 43Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 110Against 0Abst. 0No vote 26 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 50Against 8Abst. 4No vote 13 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.71
EPPFor 144Against 0Abst. 0No vote 43 of 187Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 54Against 5Abst. 4No vote 16 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.79
PatriotsFor 10Against 24Abst. 36No vote 14 of 84Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.27
ESNFor 2Against 23Abst. 0No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
No groupFor 18Against 4Abst. 2No vote 8 of 32Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

S&D members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria500
Belgium300
Bulgaria200
Cyprus100
Germany1200
Denmark300
Estonia200
Spain1700
Finland200
France800
Greece200
Croatia400
Ireland100
Italy1500
Lithuania200
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Malta300
Netherlands400
Poland300
Portugal600
Romania700
Sweden500
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 580 members

No vote recorded, 139

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 139 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
11 Feb 2025Paragraph 32 — part 2 European Central Bank – annual report 2024Split vote494 for, 87 against, 45 abstained Adopted For 79 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.83 515 voters
23 Oct 2025Paragraph 54 — part 1 Key objectives for the CITES COP20 meeting in UzbekistanSplit vote456 for, 68 against, 44 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.82 481 voters
9 Oct 2025Paragraph 13 — part 1 Second World Summit for Social DevelopmentSplit vote479 for, 68 against, 64 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.82 502 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Oct 2025Paragraph 4 — part 1 Second World Summit for Social DevelopmentSplit vote478 for, 69 against, 65 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.82 504 voters
9 Jul 2025Final vote — text as a whole Draft amending budget No 1/2025: entering the surplus of the financial year 2024Final534 for, 102 against, 56 abstained Adopted For 77 %r · shared0.81 555 voters
30 Apr 2026Paragraph 6 — part 2 Supporting democratic resilience in ArmeniaSplit vote458 for, 88 against, 22 abstained Adopted For 81 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.81 476 voters
12 Feb 2026Separate vote on paragraph 1, point p Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSeparate vote470 for, 62 against, 28 abstained Adopted For 84 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.80 559 voters
23 Oct 2025Paragraph 71 — part 1 Key objectives for the CITES COP20 meeting in UzbekistanSplit vote439 for, 100 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 77 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.79 480 voters
20 Jan 2026Amendment 178 to Article 22 Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interestAmendment529 for, 120 against, 16 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.78 548 voters
30 Apr 2026Paragraph 14 — part 2 Supporting democratic resilience in ArmeniaSplit vote445 for, 98 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 79 %Requested by Patriots, ESNr · shared0.78 472 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184747
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 8 — part 1 — Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights”. Vote, 12 February 2026. votingId 184747, reference 2025/2133(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184747 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-02-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-02-12-184747,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 8 — part 1 — Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-02-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184747}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184747},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 184747, reference 2025/2133(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}