Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 4 — part 1

Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights

Vote
Paragraph 4 — part 1
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 12 Feb 2026
Result
467 for · 100 against · 14 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
12 February 2026, 12:25
More facts (6)
Position
vote 3 of 15 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D · split vote: Members
Official label
A10-0256/2025 – Johan Danielsson – § 4/1
Text
Report A-10-2025-0256
Dossier
2025/2133(INI)
Vote id
184744
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 467 for, 100 against, 14 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 80 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘and to consider introducing a well-defined regime for the joint and several liability of economic operators and subcontractors and for ensuring transparency regarding the subcontractors involved and the share of the contract that the contractor intends to subcontract’”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 39Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 43Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 110Against 0Abst. 0No vote 26 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 56Against 3Abst. 3No vote 13 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.85
EPPFor 145Against 0Abst. 0No vote 42 of 187Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 52Against 11Abst. 0No vote 16 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.74
PatriotsFor 1Against 60Abst. 9No vote 14 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.79
ESNFor 1Against 23Abst. 1No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
No groupFor 20Against 3Abst. 1No vote 8 of 32Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria100
Czechia300
Germany700
Spain100
France100
Greece310
Italy010
Luxembourg001
Romania110
Slovakia300

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 581 members

No vote recorded, 138

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 138 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 29 — part 2 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote506 for, 88 against, 27 abstained Adopted For 81 %Requested by EPP, S&Dr · shared0.91 513 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 133 to Article 6 — part 1 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment505 for, 126 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.89 526 voters
30 Apr 2026Paragraph 6 — part 2 Supporting democratic resilience in ArmeniaSplit vote458 for, 88 against, 22 abstained Adopted For 81 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.89 477 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 Jul 2025Paragraph 49 — part 3 Security of energy supply in the EUSplit vote535 for, 122 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.89 546 voters
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 29 — part 3 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote498 for, 97 against, 22 abstained Adopted For 81 %Requested by Patriots, EPP, S&Dr · shared0.88 511 voters
9 Sept 2025Paragraph 3 — part 2 Public procurementSplit vote497 for, 126 against, 23 abstained Adopted For 77 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.88 520 voters
7 May 2025Final vote Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Court of Justice of the European UnionFinal541 for, 97 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 81 %r · shared0.88 535 voters
10 Mar 2026Separate vote on paragraph 32 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSeparate vote483 for, 106 against, 32 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.87 516 voters
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 48 — part 4 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote485 for, 106 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.87 500 voters
19 Dec 2024Paragraph 1, point a — part 1 Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote464 for, 99 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 81 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.87 473 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184744
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 4 — part 1 — Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights”. Vote, 12 February 2026. votingId 184744, reference 2025/2133(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184744 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-02-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-02-12-184744,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 4 — part 1 — Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-02-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184744}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184744},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 184744, reference 2025/2133(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}