Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 1, after paragraph 3

Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights

Vote
Amendment 1, after paragraph 3
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 12 Feb 2026
Result
211 for · 358 against · 3 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
12 February 2026, 12:25
More facts (6)
Position
vote 2 of 15 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Members
Official label
A10-0256/2025 – Johan Danielsson – After § 3 – Am 1
Text
Report A-10-2025-0256
Dossier
2025/2133(INI)
Vote id
184742
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 211 for, 358 against, 3 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 37 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 38Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 42Against 0Abst. 0No vote 11 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 103Against 7Abst. 0No vote 26 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.90
RenewFor 3Against 58Abst. 0No vote 14 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
EPPFor 5Against 139Abst. 0No vote 43 of 187Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.95
ECRFor 2Against 57Abst. 2No vote 18 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.90
PatriotsFor 0Against 69Abst. 0No vote 15 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 2Against 21Abst. 1No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.81
No groupFor 16Against 7Abst. 0No vote 9 of 32Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria100
Czechia210
Germany700
Spain010
France010
Greece220
Italy100
Luxembourg010
Romania010
Slovakia300

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 572 members

No vote recorded, 147

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 147 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 May 2025Amendment 6, adding text after recital E Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal marketAmendment172 for, 288 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 37 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.92 384 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAmendment217 for, 419 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.91 516 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 17 to paragraph 64 Public procurementAmendment224 for, 420 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.91 518 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
21 May 2026Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 21 The need to reduce work-related fatalitiesAmendment160 for, 300 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.91 398 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAmendment226 for, 414 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.91 514 voters
8 Jul 2025Amendment 5 to paragraph 34 EU-Greenland and Denmark Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement: Implementing Protocol 2025-2030 (Resolution)Amendment237 for, 436 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.91 541 voters
12 Mar 2025Amendment 11 to paragraph 37 White paper on the future of European defenceAmendment236 for, 427 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.90 534 voters
17 Jul 2024Wednesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left GroupOther149 for, 251 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 36 %r · shared0.90 328 voters
27 Nov 2025Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 9 Escalation of the war and the humanitarian catastrophe in SudanAmendment206 for, 365 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 35 %r · shared0.90 481 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 65 — part 1 of 2 Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2024Split vote237 for, 416 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 36 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.90 538 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184742
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 1, after paragraph 3 — Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights”. Vote, 12 February 2026. votingId 184742, reference 2025/2133(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184742 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-02-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-02-12-184742,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 1, after paragraph 3 — Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-02-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184742}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184742},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 184742, reference 2025/2133(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}