Skip to content

Vote · Final vote

Final vote on the whole text

Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights

Vote
Final vote on the whole text
Result
332 for · 209 against · 33 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
12 February 2026, 12:28
More facts (6)
Effect
Adopted — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 15 of 15 on the decision
Official label
A10-0256/2025 – Johan Danielsson – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Vote id
184187
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 332 for, 209 against, 33 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 58 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Adopted.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 38Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 43Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 107Against 1Abst. 0No vote 28 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 39Against 18Abst. 4No vote 14 of 75Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.46
EPPFor 84Against 39Abst. 21No vote 43 of 187Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.38
ECRFor 0Against 59Abst. 3No vote 17 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
PatriotsFor 10Against 60Abst. 0No vote 14 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.79
ESNFor 2Against 21Abst. 2No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.76
No groupFor 9Against 11Abst. 3No vote 9 of 32Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria100
Belgium200
Czechia100
Germany1300
Denmark300
Spain400
Finland100
France400
Croatia100
Italy300
Lithuania100
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands400
Sweden300

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 574 members

No vote recorded, 145

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 145 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
21 May 2026Recital A — part 2 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapSplit vote303 for, 178 against, 27 abstained Adopted For 60 %Requested by Members, S&Dr · shared0.79 421 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 22 — part 1 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategySplit vote377 for, 166 against, 35 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.79 569 voters
13 Mar 2025Paragraph 5 — part 6 Social and employment aspects of restructuring processes: the need to protect jobs and workers’ rightsSplit vote429 for, 175 against, 22 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.78 503 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 46 — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSplit vote406 for, 214 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.77 516 voters
29 Apr 2026Recital AZ — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote344 for, 216 against, 49 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by Greens, EPPr · shared0.77 503 voters
23 Oct 2025Paragraph 16 — part 3 Renewing the EU-Africa partnership: building common priorities ahead of the Angola SummitSplit vote391 for, 175 against, 13 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.77 485 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment390 for, 143 against, 64 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.76 484 voters
19 Dec 2024Final vote on the motion for a resolution Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenFinal322 for, 163 against, 46 abstained Adopted For 61 %r · shared0.76 437 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 1 Market stability reserve for the buildings, road transport and additional sectorAmendment428 for, 186 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.76 524 voters
12 Feb 2026Final vote — text as a whole Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategyFinal385 for, 141 against, 53 abstained Adopted For 66 %r · shared0.76 570 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Final vote on the whole text — Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights”. Vote, 12 February 2026. votingId 184187, reference 2025/2133(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184187 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-02-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-02-12-184187,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Final vote on the whole text — Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-02-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184187}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-12/184187},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 184187, reference 2025/2133(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}