Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 5, after paragraph 28

European Central Bank – annual report 2025

Vote
Amendment 5, after paragraph 28
Decision
No. 9 of the sitting of 10 Feb 2026
Result
234 for · 393 against · 17 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
10 February 2026, 13:15
More facts (6)
Position
vote 39 of 56 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR
Official label
A10-0002/2026 – Johan Van Overtveldt – After § 28 – Am 5
Text
Report A-10-2026-0002
Dossier
2025/2182(INI)
Vote id
184709
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 234 for, 393 against, 17 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 36 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 4Against 25Abst. 9No vote 8 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.49
GreensFor 0Against 48Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 6Against 116Abst. 0No vote 13 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
RenewFor 3Against 66Abst. 0No vote 6 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
EPPFor 33Against 135Abst. 6No vote 13 of 187Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.66
ECRFor 73Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 71Against 0Abst. 0No vote 13 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 23Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 21Against 3Abst. 2No vote 6 of 32Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ECR members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium300
Bulgaria100
Cyprus100
Czechia300
Denmark100
Estonia100
Spain200
Finland100
France400
Greece200
Croatia100
Italy2100
Lithuania200
Latvia200
Netherlands100
Poland1900
Romania500
Sweden300

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 644 members

No vote recorded, 74

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 74 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Amendment 45 to paragraph 33 Discharge 2024: AgenciesAmendment238 for, 398 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 37 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.90 580 voters
3 Apr 2025Amendment 20, adding text after paragraph 1 Energy-intensive industriesAmendment209 for, 386 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.90 544 voters
23 Oct 2025Amendment 3 to paragraph 38 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Amendment210 for, 357 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 37 %Requested by Greens, Patriotsr · shared0.89 520 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
23 Oct 2025Amendment 8 to paragraph 78 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Amendment211 for, 360 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 37 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.89 523 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 26, adding text after Article 1 Market stability reserve for the buildings, road transport and additional sectorAmendment242 for, 382 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 38 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.89 575 voters
23 Oct 2025Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 78 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Amendment175 for, 366 against, 33 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.89 522 voters
10 Sept 2025Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 8 Future of agriculture and the post-2027 common agricultural policyAmendment219 for, 420 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 34 %r · shared0.88 585 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 20, adding text after paragraph 226 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionAmendment199 for, 402 against, 40 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.88 578 voters
23 Oct 2025Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 78 — part 1 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Amendment204 for, 354 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 36 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.88 522 voters
23 Oct 2025Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 78 — part 2 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Amendment200 for, 353 against, 19 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.88 521 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-10/184709
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 5, after paragraph 28 — European Central Bank – annual report 2025”. Vote, 10 February 2026. votingId 184709, reference 2025/2182(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-10/184709 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-02-10/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-02-10-184709,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 5, after paragraph 28 — European Central Bank – annual report 2025}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-02-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-10/184709}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-10/184709},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 184709, reference 2025/2182(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}