Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 35 — part 2

European Central Bank – annual report 2025

Vote
Paragraph 35 — part 2
Decision
No. 9 of the sitting of 10 Feb 2026
Result
442 for · 149 against · 55 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
10 February 2026, 13:16
More facts (6)
Position
vote 43 of 56 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ESN · split vote: ESN
Official label
A10-0002/2026 – Johan Van Overtveldt – § 35/2
Text
Report A-10-2026-0002
Dossier
2025/2182(INI)
Vote id
184473
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 442 for, 149 against, 55 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 68 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “those words”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 42Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 45Against 3Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.91
S&DFor 120Against 0Abst. 1No vote 14 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 67Against 1Abst. 0No vote 7 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 155Against 12Abst. 2No vote 18 of 187Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
ECRFor 9Against 58Abst. 6No vote 6 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.69
PatriotsFor 0Against 39Abst. 32No vote 13 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.32
ESNFor 0Against 24Abst. 1No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 4Against 12Abst. 13No vote 3 of 32Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium100
Czechia100
Germany1500
Denmark300
Spain400
Finland100
France230
Croatia100
Italy300
Lithuania100
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands400
Romania100
Sweden300
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 646 members

No vote recorded, 72

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 72 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point q — part 1 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote373 for, 139 against, 53 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.89 544 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point r — part 1 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote386 for, 165 against, 17 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.88 546 voters
28 Apr 2026Paragraph 21 — part 1 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUSplit vote444 for, 152 against, 54 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.88 590 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Recital AP — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote424 for, 188 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.88 567 voters
23 Jan 2025Paragraph 10 — part 2 Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against UkraineSplit vote419 for, 172 against, 23 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.87 555 voters
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionFinal418 for, 207 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 65 %r · shared0.87 583 voters
25 Nov 2025Recital BJ — part 2 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSplit vote410 for, 190 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.87 578 voters
25 Nov 2025Recital BE — part 2 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSplit vote408 for, 209 against, 11 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.87 574 voters
25 Nov 2025Recital BD — part 2 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSplit vote416 for, 202 against, 12 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.87 577 voters
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Final416 for, 190 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 67 %r · shared0.87 563 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-10/184473
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 35 — part 2 — European Central Bank – annual report 2025”. Vote, 10 February 2026. votingId 184473, reference 2025/2182(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-10/184473 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-02-10/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-02-10-184473,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 35 — part 2 — European Central Bank – annual report 2025}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-02-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-10/184473}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-10/184473},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 184473, reference 2025/2182(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}