Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Proposal to reject the text

Application of the ‘safe third country’ concept

Vote
Proposal to reject the text
Decision
No. 2 of the sitting of 10 Feb 2026
Result
220 for · 396 against · 37 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
10 February 2026, 12:58
More facts (5)
Position
vote 1 of 2 on the decision
Official label
A10-0255/2025 – Lena Düpont – Proposal for rejection – Am 14= 15= 16=
Text
Report A-10-2025-0255
Dossier
2025/0132(COD)
Vote id
184418
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 220 for, 396 against, 37 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 34 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 42Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 46Against 0Abst. 1No vote 6 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 92Against 19Abst. 10No vote 14 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.64
RenewFor 35Against 17Abst. 15No vote 8 of 75Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.28
EPPFor 0Against 168Abst. 9No vote 10 of 187Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.92
ECRFor 0Against 73Abst. 0No vote 6 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 0Against 71Abst. 0No vote 13 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 25Abst. 0No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 5Against 23Abst. 2No vote 2 of 32Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria030
Czechia010
Germany0130
France010
Hungary010
Lithuania010
Poland030
Slovakia020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 653 members

No vote recorded, 65

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 65 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Jun 2026Proposal to vote on amendments Common system for the return of third-country nationals staying illegally in the Union (Return Regulation)Procedural258 for, 394 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 39 %r · shared0.92 604 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 68 to paragraph 11 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment235 for, 358 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.90 547 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 207 + 266 + 348 (voted as one) to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment251 for, 378 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by S&D, The Leftr · shared0.90 587 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Sept 2026Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.89 540 voters
17 Jun 2026Amendment 6 to paragraph 49 2025 Commission report on AlbaniaAmendment261 for, 379 against, 21 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.88 607 voters
17 Jun 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 49 2025 Commission report on AlbaniaAmendment254 for, 389 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.88 602 voters
10 Jul 2025Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 5 Urgent need to protect religious minorities in Syria following the recent terrorist attack on Mar Elias Church in DamascusAmendment212 for, 363 against, 71 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.88 592 voters
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 50 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Separate vote272 for, 348 against, 23 abstained Rejected For 42 %Requested by Greens, EPPr · shared0.88 586 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 52 to paragraph 11 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.88 546 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 16, adding text after recital G The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.88 531 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 2 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-10/184418
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Proposal to reject the text — Application of the ‘safe third country’ concept”. Vote, 10 February 2026. votingId 184418, reference 2025/0132(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-10/184418 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-02-10/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-02-10-184418,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Proposal to reject the text — Application of the ‘safe third country’ concept}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-02-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-10/184418}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-02-10/184418},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 184418, reference 2025/0132(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}