Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Recital P — part 2

Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania

Vote
Recital P — part 2
Result
426 for · 141 against · 42 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
22 January 2026, 12:20
More facts (6)
Position
vote 31 of 44 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Renew · split vote: S&D
Official label
RC-B10-0070/2026 – Recital P/2
Vote id
184057
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 426 for, 141 against, 42 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 70 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “and explicitly indicating an intention to enable her removal from office; whereas legislation targeting a specific individual (<i>ad personam</i> legislation) is incompatible with the principles of the rule of law, including legal certainty, the generality of laws and the prohibition of the arbitrary exercise of power;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 37Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 49Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 108Against 0Abst. 0No vote 28 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 62Against 0Abst. 0No vote 13 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 161Against 1Abst. 0No vote 25 of 187Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 0Against 62Abst. 1No vote 16 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 0Against 66Abst. 12No vote 8 of 86Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.77
ESNFor 2Against 6Abst. 17No vote 2 of 27Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.52
No groupFor 7Against 6Abst. 12No vote 5 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ECR members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium010
Bulgaria010
Cyprus010
Czechia020
Denmark010
Estonia010
Spain020
France040
Greece020
Croatia010
Italy0180
Lithuania020
Latvia021
Netherlands010
Poland0170
Romania030
Sweden030

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 609 members

No vote recorded, 110

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 110 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Final416 for, 190 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 67 %r · shared0.94 536 voters
23 Oct 2025Separate vote on paragraph 3 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Separate vote383 for, 170 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.94 509 voters
29 Apr 2026Citation 44 — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote433 for, 161 against, 28 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.94 534 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Sept 2025Paragraph 86 — part 2 Public procurementSplit vote450 for, 183 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.94 551 voters
7 May 2025Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2023: European Public Prosecutor’s OfficeFinal452 for, 176 against, 30 abstained Adopted For 69 %r · shared0.94 561 voters
23 Oct 2025Separate vote on paragraph 9 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Separate vote385 for, 178 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.94 509 voters
9 Sept 2025Recital AH — part 2 of 2 Public procurementSplit vote448 for, 186 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.94 553 voters
9 Sept 2025Paragraph 65 — part 2 Public procurementSplit vote444 for, 185 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by S&D, Patriotsr · shared0.94 547 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 150 to Article 6 — part 1 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment452 for, 195 against, 2 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.94 556 voters
20 May 2026Separate vote on citation 7 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseSeparate vote426 for, 192 against, 17 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.93 552 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Recital P — part 2 — Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania”. Vote, 22 January 2026. votingId 184057, reference 2026/2568(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-22/184057 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 22 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-22-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 22 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-22-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-22, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-01-22/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-01-22-184057,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Recital P — part 2 — Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-01-22},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-22/184057}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-22/184057},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 184057, reference 2026/2568(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-22-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-22-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-22 (CC BY 4.0)}
}