Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 4 to paragraph 59

European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructure

Vote
Amendment 4 to paragraph 59
Decision
No. 8 of the sitting of 22 Jan 2026
Result
130 for · 473 against · 30 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
22 January 2026, 12:09
More facts (6)
Position
vote 7 of 23 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Members
Official label
A10-0107/2025 – Sarah Knafo – § 59 – Am 4
Text
Report A-10-2025-0107
Dossier
2025/2007(INI)
Vote id
183899
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 130 for, 473 against, 30 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 21 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 1Against 35Abst. 2No vote 8 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
GreensFor 0Against 49Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 114Abst. 0No vote 22 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 63Abst. 1No vote 11 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 6Against 164Abst. 0No vote 17 of 187Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.95
ECRFor 8Against 40Abst. 18No vote 13 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.41
PatriotsFor 78Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 86Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 24Against 2Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
No groupFor 13Against 6Abst. 9No vote 2 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria020
Belgium020
Czechia010
Germany0150
Denmark020
Spain040
Finland020
France040
Croatia010
Italy040
Lithuania010
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Netherlands060
Romania010
Sweden020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 633 members

No vote recorded, 86

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 86 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Mar 2026Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE GroupOther87 for, 291 against, 22 abstained Rejected For 22 %r · shared0.92 361 voters
26 Nov 2025Amendment 4 to paragraph 1, after point o EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the ArcticAmendment131 for, 477 against, 57 abstained Rejected For 20 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.91 596 voters
21 May 2026Amendment 6 to recital Y The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forwardAmendment122 for, 432 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 22 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.90 501 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
7 Oct 2024Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE GroupOther85 for, 335 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 20 %r · shared0.90 375 voters
22 Oct 2025Amendment 481 Draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAmendment145 for, 503 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 22 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.89 579 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 12 to recital Q Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024Amendment141 for, 464 against, 70 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.89 598 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 59, adding text after paragraph 33 2025 Commission report on UkraineAmendment127 for, 469 against, 53 abstained Rejected For 20 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.89 574 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 75, adding text after paragraph 65 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034Amendment133 for, 452 against, 66 abstained Rejected For 20 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.89 582 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 137 to paragraph 18 Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2024Amendment115 for, 531 against, 22 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.88 592 voters
18 Dec 2024Amendments 9 + 14 (voted as one) to paragraph 4, after point 2, point 3 and after point 3 Amendment of Annex VI – Powers and responsibilities of the standing committeesAmendment111 for, 510 against, 30 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.88 580 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-22/183899
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 4 to paragraph 59 — European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructure”. Vote, 22 January 2026. votingId 183899, reference 2025/2007(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-22/183899 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 22 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-22-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 22 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-22-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-22, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-01-22/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-01-22-183899,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 4 to paragraph 59 — European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructure}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-01-22},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-22/183899}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-22/183899},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 183899, reference 2025/2007(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-22-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-22-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-22 (CC BY 4.0)}
}