Skip to content

Vote · Final vote

Final vote on the motion for a resolution

Motion of censure on the Commission

Vote
Final vote on the motion for a resolution
Result
165 for · 390 against · 10 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
22 January 2026, 12:02
More facts (6)
Effect
Rejected — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 1 of 1 on the decision
Official label
B10-0063/2026 – Motion for a resolution
Vote id
183538
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 165 for, 390 against, 10 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 29 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Rejected.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 8Against 0Abst. 3No vote 35 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion —
GreensFor 0Against 43Abst. 0No vote 10 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 2Against 98Abst. 0No vote 36 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
RenewFor 2Against 59Abst. 2No vote 12 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.90
EPPFor 1Against 159Abst. 4No vote 23 of 187Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.95
ECRFor 32Against 27Abst. 1No vote 19 of 79Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.30
PatriotsFor 73Against 0Abst. 0No vote 13 of 86Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 25Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 22Against 4Abst. 0No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria010
Belgium030
Bulgaria020
Germany140
Denmark040
Estonia020
Spain010
Finland030
France0120
Ireland141
Lithuania020
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Netherlands070
Portugal010
Romania030
Sweden020
Slovenia011
Slovakia050

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 565 members

No vote recorded, 154

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 154 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Jul 2025Final vote on the motion for a resolution Motion of censure on the CommissionFinal175 for, 360 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 32 %r · shared0.98 471 voters
9 Oct 2025Final vote on the motion for a resolution Motion of censure on the CommissionFinal179 for, 378 against, 37 abstained Rejected For 30 %r · shared0.92 490 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 5, adding text after recital A The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportAmendment165 for, 464 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 26 %Requested by S&D, Membersr · shared0.91 520 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
7 May 2025Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 3 Discharge 2023: European Public Prosecutor’s OfficeAmendment209 for, 413 against, 38 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.90 526 voters
7 Jul 2026Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 6 Financial activities of the European Investment Bank Group – annual report 2025Amendment139 for, 498 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.90 521 voters
20 Jan 2026Amendment 35 to paragraph 40 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companiesAmendment124 for, 500 against, 28 abstained Rejected For 19 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.89 549 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 38, adding text after paragraph 3 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment171 for, 436 against, 36 abstained Rejected For 27 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.89 524 voters
10 Sept 2025Amendment 3, adding text after recital AN Future of agriculture and the post-2027 common agricultural policyAmendment170 for, 438 against, 47 abstained Rejected For 26 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.89 522 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 22 to paragraph 24 Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience FacilityAmendment175 for, 433 against, 37 abstained Rejected For 27 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.89 516 voters
10 Feb 2026Amendment 38, adding text after paragraph 27 European Central Bank – annual report 2025Amendment139 for, 491 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.89 533 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 1 connection: The decision

The decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Final vote on the motion for a resolution — Motion of censure on the Commission”. Vote, 22 January 2026. votingId 183538, reference 2026/2002(INS). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-22/183538 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 22 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-22-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 22 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-22-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-22, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-01-22/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-01-22-183538,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Final vote on the motion for a resolution — Motion of censure on the Commission}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-01-22},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-22/183538}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-22/183538},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 183538, reference 2026/2002(INS). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-22-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-22-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-22 (CC BY 4.0)}
}