Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Final vote on the motion for a resolution

Request for opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement (EMPA) and Interim Trade Agreement (ITA)

Vote
Final vote on the motion for a resolution
Decision
No. 4 of the sitting of 21 Jan 2026
Result
225 for · 402 against · 13 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
21 January 2026, 12:49
More facts (6)
Position
vote 2 of 2 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left, Patriots
Official label
B10-0061/2026 – Motion for a resolution
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0060
Dossier
2026/2560(RSP)
Vote id
183885
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 225 for, 402 against, 13 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 35 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 12Against 15Abst. 1No vote 18 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.30
GreensFor 0Against 46Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 10Against 102Abst. 0No vote 24 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.87
RenewFor 7Against 60Abst. 3No vote 5 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.79
EPPFor 40Against 139Abst. 0No vote 8 of 187Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.66
ECRFor 37Against 37Abst. 0No vote 5 of 79Majority line TieClear line Divided Cohesion 0.25
PatriotsFor 72Against 1Abst. 7No vote 6 of 86Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.85
ESNFor 24Against 1Abst. 0No vote 2 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 23Against 1Abst. 2No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria140
Belgium030
Bulgaria050
Cyprus020
Czechia050
Germany0300
Denmark020
Estonia020
Spain0210
Finland040
France500
Greece070
Croatia060
Hungary700
Ireland130
Italy090
Lithuania030
Luxembourg020
Latvia020
Malta010
Netherlands240
Poland2000
Portugal070
Romania0100
Sweden050
Slovenia410
Slovakia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 640 members

No vote recorded, 79

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 79 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
23 Oct 2025Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 83 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Amendment162 for, 367 against, 32 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.84 508 voters
10 Sept 2025Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 27 Future of agriculture and the post-2027 common agricultural policyAmendment213 for, 366 against, 57 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.83 583 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 20 to paragraph 33 2025 Commission report on UkraineAmendment201 for, 409 against, 39 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESN, ECR, EPPr · shared0.78 578 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 Jul 2026Amendment 22, adding text after paragraph 61 2025 Commission report on UkraineAmendment181 for, 411 against, 51 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by ESN, ECR, EPPr · shared0.78 569 voters
12 Feb 2025Amendment 4, adding text after recital J Genetically modified maize MON 95275Amendment209 for, 407 against, 32 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.77 572 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 23 to Article 1, paragraph 1, après le point 3 Règlement (UE) 2019/631 Article 15, paragraph 1 CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027Amendment159 for, 347 against, 55 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Patriots, The Leftr · shared0.77 505 voters
10 Jul 2025Final vote on the motion for a resolution Motion of censure on the CommissionFinal175 for, 360 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 32 %r · shared0.76 506 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 21 to Article 1, paragraph 1, point 3 Règlement (UE) 2019/631 Article 8 CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027Amendment139 for, 389 against, 41 abstained Rejected For 24 %Requested by Patriots, The Leftr · shared0.76 514 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 21, adding text after paragraph 61 2025 Commission report on UkraineAmendment191 for, 414 against, 47 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESN, ECR, EPPr · shared0.76 577 voters
22 Jan 2026Final vote on the motion for a resolution Motion of censure on the CommissionFinal165 for, 390 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 29 %r · shared0.76 545 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 2 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-21/183885
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Final vote on the motion for a resolution — Request for opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement (EMPA) and Interim Trade Agreement (ITA)”. Vote, 21 January 2026. votingId 183885, reference 2026/2560(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-21/183885 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 21 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-21-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 21 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-21-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-21, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-01-21/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-01-21-183885,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Final vote on the motion for a resolution — Request for opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement (EMPA) and Interim Trade Agreement (ITA)}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-01-21},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-21/183885}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-21/183885},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 183885, reference 2026/2560(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-21-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-21-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-21 (CC BY 4.0)}
}