Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Final vote on the motion for a resolution

Request for opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement (EMPA) and Interim Trade Agreement (ITA)

Vote
Final vote on the motion for a resolution
Decision
No. 4 of the sitting of 21 Jan 2026
Result
334 for · 324 against · 11 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
21 January 2026, 12:48
More facts (7)
Effect
Adopted — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 1 of 2 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left, Patriots
Official label
B10-0060/2026 – Motion for a resolution
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0060
Dossier
2026/2560(RSP)
Vote id
183884
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 334 for, 324 against, 11 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 50 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Adopted.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 38Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 36Against 12Abst. 1No vote 4 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.60
S&DFor 35Against 90Abst. 0No vote 11 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.58
RenewFor 24Against 46Abst. 0No vote 5 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.49
EPPFor 43Against 135Abst. 2No vote 7 of 187Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.63
ECRFor 35Against 39Abst. 0No vote 5 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.29
PatriotsFor 72Against 1Abst. 7No vote 6 of 86Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.85
ESNFor 24Against 1Abst. 0No vote 2 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 27Against 0Abst. 1No vote 2 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria200
Cyprus100
Czechia200
Germany900
France100
Greece400
Luxembourg100
Romania101
Slovakia600

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 669 members

No vote recorded, 50

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 50 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
16 Dec 2025Amendment 85 to Article 9 Bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and the EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement for agricultural productsAmendment283 for, 348 against, 26 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by EPP, The Leftr · shared0.78 621 voters
21 Jan 2026Amendment 64 to recital AJ Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025Amendment276 for, 322 against, 67 abstained Rejected For 42 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.77 655 voters
16 Dec 2025Amendment 84 to Article 6 Bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and the EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement for agricultural productsAmendment288 for, 346 against, 26 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by EPP, The Leftr · shared0.77 622 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
16 Dec 2025Amendments 64 + 88 (voted as one), adding text after Article 12 Bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and the EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement for agricultural productsAmendment374 for, 277 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by Greens, EPPr · shared0.76 623 voters
16 Dec 2025Amendments 36 + 87 (voted as one) to Article 11 Bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and the EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement for agricultural productsAmendment346 for, 304 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 53 %Requested by EPP, The Leftr · shared0.74 619 voters
16 Dec 2025Amendment 38, adding text after Article 12 Bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and the EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement for agricultural productsAmendment275 for, 373 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 42 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.74 621 voters
12 Mar 2026Amendment 41, adding text after paragraph 21 Activities of the European Ombudsman – annual report 2024Amendment217 for, 332 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.74 525 voters
16 Dec 2025Amendment 22 to Article 2 Bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and the EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement for agricultural productsAmendment252 for, 376 against, 30 abstained Rejected For 38 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.72 620 voters
16 Dec 2025Amendment 62 to Article 7 Bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and the EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement for agricultural productsAmendment294 for, 357 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.72 622 voters
16 Dec 2025Amendment 29 to Article 5 Bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and the EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement for agricultural productsAmendment269 for, 384 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 41 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.72 620 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 2 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-21/183884
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Final vote on the motion for a resolution — Request for opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement (EMPA) and Interim Trade Agreement (ITA)”. Vote, 21 January 2026. votingId 183884, reference 2026/2560(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-21/183884 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 21 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-21-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 21 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-21-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-21, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-01-21/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-01-21-183884,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Final vote on the motion for a resolution — Request for opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement (EMPA) and Interim Trade Agreement (ITA)}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-01-21},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-21/183884}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-21/183884},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 183884, reference 2026/2560(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-21-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-21-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-21 (CC BY 4.0)}
}