Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 93 — part 2

Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025

Vote
Paragraph 93 — part 2
Result
394 for · 241 against · 30 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
21 January 2026, 13:13
More facts (6)
Position
vote 136 of 166 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR · split vote: ECR
Official label
A10-0253/2025 – David McAllister – § 93/2
Vote id
183844
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 394 for, 241 against, 30 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 59 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: ‘notes that some progress on the CFSP can be made by using the provisions in the existing Treaties, such as the ‘passerelle clause’; stresses that the Treaties should provide specifically for the possibility of establishing a European Defence Union, and that the VP/HR should be supported in her efforts to become the main external representative of the EU in international forums;’

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 3Against 28Abst. 8No vote 7 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.58
GreensFor 52Against 0Abst. 0No vote 1 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 115Against 9Abst. 2No vote 10 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.87
RenewFor 69Against 2Abst. 0No vote 4 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
EPPFor 149Against 11Abst. 11No vote 16 of 187Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.81
ECRFor 2Against 69Abst. 2No vote 6 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.92
PatriotsFor 1Against 79Abst. 0No vote 6 of 86Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
ESNFor 0Against 21Abst. 5No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.71
No groupFor 3Against 22Abst. 2No vote 3 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria060
Belgium020
Czechia080
Denmark010
Spain060
France1280
Greece010
Hungary0100
Italy070
Latvia010
Netherlands060
Poland020
Portugal010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 665 members

No vote recorded, 54

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 54 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 May 2025Amendment 121 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment358 for, 208 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 62 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.89 536 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 120 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment361 for, 209 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.89 538 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 119 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment357 for, 206 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by Patriots, Greensr · shared0.88 531 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Oct 2025Paragraph 9 — part 3 United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructureSplit vote356 for, 218 against, 39 abstained Adopted For 58 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.87 573 voters
15 Sept 2026Paragraph 9 — part 2 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldSplit vote413 for, 237 against, 17 abstained Adopted For 62 %Requested by ESN, Patriotsr · shared0.87 616 voters
11 Mar 2026Final vote — text as a whole European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026Final392 for, 219 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 62 %r · shared0.87 590 voters
2 Apr 2025Paragraph 49 — part 2 Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2024Split vote373 for, 275 against, 12 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by EPP, Patriotsr · shared0.87 613 voters
18 Jun 2026Paragraph 9 — part 1 Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and FinlandSplit vote319 for, 190 against, 38 abstained Adopted For 58 %Requested by Patriots, ECRr · shared0.87 505 voters
9 Oct 2025Paragraph 10 — part 2 United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructureSplit vote369 for, 212 against, 35 abstained Adopted For 60 %r · shared0.86 575 voters
15 Sept 2026Final vote — text as a whole Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldFinal420 for, 220 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 63 %r · shared0.86 613 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 93 — part 2 — Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025”. Vote, 21 January 2026. votingId 183844, reference 2025/2164(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-21/183844 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 21 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-21-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 21 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-21-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-21, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-01-21/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-01-21-183844,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 93 — part 2 — Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-01-21},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-21/183844}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-21/183844},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 183844, reference 2025/2164(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-21-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-21-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-21 (CC BY 4.0)}
}