Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 37, after paragraph 78

Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025

Vote
Amendment 37, after paragraph 78
Decision
No. 5 of the sitting of 21 Jan 2026
Result
253 for · 361 against · 49 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
21 January 2026, 13:12
More facts (6)
Position
vote 123 of 166 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
A10-0253/2025 – David McAllister – After § 78 – Am 37
Text
Report A-10-2025-0253
Dossier
2025/2164(INI)
Vote id
183833
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 253 for, 361 against, 49 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 38 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 40Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 51Against 0Abst. 1No vote 1 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 110Against 0Abst. 15No vote 11 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.82
RenewFor 6Against 56Abst. 7No vote 6 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.72
EPPFor 0Against 172Abst. 0No vote 15 of 187Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 0Against 71Abst. 3No vote 5 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
PatriotsFor 30Against 38Abst. 12No vote 6 of 86Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.21
ESNFor 2Against 18Abst. 5No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.58
No groupFor 14Against 6Abst. 6No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium200
Czechia100
Germany1500
Denmark201
Spain400
Finland200
France500
Croatia100
Italy400
Lithuania100
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands600
Romania100
Sweden200
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 663 members

No vote recorded, 56

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 56 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Sept 2025Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAmendment250 for, 391 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.91 601 voters
22 Jan 2026Amendment 5, adding text after recital A Presidential elections in Honduras, the non-recognition of the outcome by the incumbent administration and the attacks on opposition members of the National AssemblyAmendment215 for, 362 against, 39 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.90 608 voters
19 Sept 2024Amendment 4 to paragraph 6 The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in CubaAmendment241 for, 345 against, 30 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.90 565 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 Jun 2026Amendment 13, adding text after recital A Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAmendment238 for, 315 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 42 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.89 520 voters
7 Jul 2026Amendment 4 to paragraph 33 A coherent tax framework for the EU’s financial sectorAmendment214 for, 389 against, 54 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.88 605 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 7 to paragraph 36 Public procurementAmendment261 for, 365 against, 22 abstained Rejected For 40 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.88 602 voters
19 Sept 2024Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 6 The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in CubaAmendment231 for, 326 against, 58 abstained Rejected For 38 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.88 564 voters
19 Sept 2024Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 6 The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in CubaAmendment209 for, 359 against, 43 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.88 562 voters
18 Jun 2026Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 1 Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAmendment185 for, 334 against, 44 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.87 519 voters
7 Jul 2026Amendment 5 to paragraph 34 A coherent tax framework for the EU’s financial sectorAmendment210 for, 393 against, 45 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.87 597 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-21/183833
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 37, after paragraph 78 — Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025”. Vote, 21 January 2026. votingId 183833, reference 2025/2164(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-21/183833 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 21 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-21-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 21 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-21-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-21, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-01-21/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-01-21-183833,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 37, after paragraph 78 — Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-01-21},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-21/183833}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-21/183833},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 183833, reference 2025/2164(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-21-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-21-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-21 (CC BY 4.0)}
}