Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 80 — part 1

Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2025

Vote
Paragraph 80 — part 1
Result
512 for · 109 against · 46 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
21 January 2026, 13:27
More facts (6)
Position
vote 76 of 98 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: EPP · split vote: EPP, Patriots, ECR
Official label
A10-0265/2025 – Thijs Reuten – § 80/1
Vote id
183635
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 512 for, 109 against, 46 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 77 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Reaffirms its call to create a permanent format for the Council of Defence Ministers as a forum for political and strategic coordination,”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 6Against 23Abst. 10No vote 7 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.38
GreensFor 52Against 0Abst. 0No vote 1 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 124Against 0Abst. 3No vote 9 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
RenewFor 70Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 170Against 0Abst. 2No vote 15 of 187Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
ECRFor 32Against 22Abst. 20No vote 5 of 79Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.15
PatriotsFor 47Against 27Abst. 6No vote 6 of 86Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.38
ESNFor 4Against 20Abst. 2No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.65
No groupFor 7Against 17Abst. 3No vote 3 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria500
Belgium300
Bulgaria500
Cyprus002
Czechia500
Germany3000
Denmark200
Estonia200
Spain2100
Finland400
France500
Greece700
Croatia600
Ireland400
Italy800
Lithuania300
Luxembourg200
Latvia200
Malta100
Netherlands600
Poland2100
Portugal700
Romania1000
Sweden500
Slovenia500
Slovakia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 667 members

No vote recorded, 52

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 52 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Mar 2026Final vote on the provisional agreement Increased efficiency of the External Action GuaranteeFinal441 for, 105 against, 81 abstained Adopted For 70 %r · shared0.82 593 voters
23 Oct 2025Separate vote on paragraph 111 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Separate vote375 for, 97 against, 101 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.75 543 voters
18 May 2026Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the Renew Group — Reduced US military deployment in Europe Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the Renew Group – Reduced US military deployment in EuropeOther342 for, 65 against, 41 abstained Adopted For 76 %r · shared0.75 418 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 Jun 2026Paragraph 9 — part 2 Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and FinlandSplit vote357 for, 144 against, 49 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.75 509 voters
18 Jun 2026Paragraph 9 — part 1 Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and FinlandSplit vote319 for, 190 against, 38 abstained Adopted For 58 %Requested by Patriots, ECRr · shared0.74 506 voters
18 Jun 2026Final vote — text as a whole Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and FinlandFinal412 for, 63 against, 53 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.73 494 voters
15 Sept 2026Separate vote on paragraph 30 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldSeparate vote433 for, 137 against, 93 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.73 614 voters
24 Feb 2026Paragraph 5 — part 2 Four years of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for UkraineSplit vote492 for, 70 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 85 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.73 549 voters
11 Mar 2026Final vote — text as a whole Tackling barriers to the single market for defenceFinal393 for, 169 against, 67 abstained Adopted For 62 %r · shared0.73 593 voters
11 Mar 2026Final vote on the motion for a resolution Flagship European defence projects of common interestFinal448 for, 122 against, 38 abstained Adopted For 74 %r · shared0.73 573 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 80 — part 1 — Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2025”. Vote, 21 January 2026. votingId 183635, reference 2025/2165(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-21/183635 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 21 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-21-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 21 January 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-21-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-21, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-01-21/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-01-21-183635,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 80 — part 1 — Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2025}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-01-21},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-21/183635}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-01-21/183635},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 183635, reference 2025/2165(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-21-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-01-21-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-01-21 (CC BY 4.0)}
}