Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 3, after recital C

Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime

Vote
Amendment 3, after recital C
Decision
No. 5 of the sitting of 18 Dec 2025
Result
197 for · 378 against · 7 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
18 December 2025, 12:15
More facts (6)
Position
vote 22 of 26 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
A10-0240/2025 – Jean-Marc Germain, Monika Hohlmeier – After recital C – Am 3
Text
Report A-10-2025-0240
Dossier
2025/2061(INI)
Vote id
182988
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 197 for, 378 against, 7 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 34 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 37Abst. 0No vote 9 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 43Abst. 0No vote 10 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 102Abst. 0No vote 34 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 60Abst. 0No vote 15 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 16Against 133Abst. 0No vote 39 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.84
ECRFor 63Against 0Abst. 6No vote 10 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.87
PatriotsFor 76Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 23Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 19Against 3Abst. 1No vote 7 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria100
Czechia100
Germany1400
France100
Hungary100
Lithuania100
Poland200
Slovakia200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 582 members

No vote recorded, 137

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 137 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Mar 2026Amendment 5, adding text after recital E Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment182 for, 422 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 497 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 32 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment182 for, 415 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 494 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 5 to paragraph 91 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment207 for, 406 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 509 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Mar 2025Amendment 23 to recital M The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in SyriaAmendment217 for, 444 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 540 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 17 Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Amendment197 for, 421 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 511 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 2, adding text after recital E Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment180 for, 419 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 494 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 4, adding text after recital E Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment186 for, 423 against, 0 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 499 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 1, adding text after citation 13 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment183 for, 421 against, 0 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 496 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 47 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportAmendment194 for, 437 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by S&D, Membersr · shared0.96 531 voters
12 Mar 2025Amendment 25 to recital P The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in SyriaAmendment197 for, 455 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 536 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-18/182988
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 3, after recital C — Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime”. Vote, 18 December 2025. votingId 182988, reference 2025/2061(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-18/182988 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 18 December 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-18-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 18 December 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-18-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-12-18, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-12-18/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-12-18-182988,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 3, after recital C — Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-12-18},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-18/182988}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-18/182988},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 182988, reference 2025/2061(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-18-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-18-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-12-18 (CC BY 4.0)}
}