Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Separate vote: paragraph 39

Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime

Vote
Separate vote: paragraph 39
Decision
No. 5 of the sitting of 18 Dec 2025
Result
411 for · 152 against · 20 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
18 December 2025, 12:13
More facts (6)
Position
vote 14 of 26 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: EPP
Official label
A10-0240/2025 – Jean-Marc Germain, Monika Hohlmeier – § 39
Text
Report A-10-2025-0240
Dossier
2025/2061(INI)
Vote id
182981
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 411 for, 152 against, 20 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 70 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 36Against 0Abst. 1No vote 9 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
GreensFor 43Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 103Against 0Abst. 0No vote 33 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 60Against 0Abst. 0No vote 15 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 150Against 0Abst. 0No vote 38 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 9Against 59Abst. 1No vote 10 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.78
PatriotsFor 0Against 67Abst. 8No vote 10 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.84
ESNFor 3Against 18Abst. 2No vote 4 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.67
No groupFor 7Against 8Abst. 8No vote 7 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria010
Czechia010
Germany1140
France001
Hungary001
Poland200
Slovakia020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 583 members

No vote recorded, 136

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 136 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
25 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 22 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSeparate vote453 for, 168 against, 22 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 543 voters
22 Jan 2026Paragraph 10 — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote427 for, 161 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.95 521 voters
25 Nov 2025Separate vote on recital AK Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSeparate vote440 for, 175 against, 22 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.95 537 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 Jan 2026Paragraph 11 — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote430 for, 157 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.95 518 voters
22 Jan 2026Separate vote on paragraph 4 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSeparate vote431 for, 140 against, 32 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.95 517 voters
22 Jan 2026Recital O — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote426 for, 151 against, 31 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.95 519 voters
22 Jan 2026Paragraph 5 — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote430 for, 145 against, 33 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.95 518 voters
22 Jan 2026Recital Q — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote421 for, 150 against, 35 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.95 517 voters
22 Jan 2026Separate vote on paragraph 6 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSeparate vote424 for, 158 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.94 521 voters
22 Jan 2026Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 3 European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructureAmendment426 for, 180 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Patriots, Renewr · shared0.94 534 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-18/182981
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Separate vote: paragraph 39 — Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime”. Vote, 18 December 2025. votingId 182981, reference 2025/2061(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-18/182981 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 18 December 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-18-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 18 December 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-18-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-12-18, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-12-18/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-12-18-182981,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Separate vote: paragraph 39 — Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-12-18},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-18/182981}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-18/182981},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 182981, reference 2025/2061(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-18-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-18-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-12-18 (CC BY 4.0)}
}