Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 15, after paragraph 20

Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime

Vote
Amendment 15, after paragraph 20
Result
179 for · 396 against · 9 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
18 December 2025, 12:10
More facts (6)
Position
vote 9 of 26 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
A10-0240/2025 – Jean-Marc Germain, Monika Hohlmeier – After § 20 – Am 15
Vote id
182975
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 179 for, 396 against, 9 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 31 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 37Abst. 0No vote 9 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 43Abst. 0No vote 10 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 103Abst. 0No vote 33 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 60Abst. 0No vote 15 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 2Against 146Abst. 0No vote 40 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
ECRFor 63Against 0Abst. 6No vote 10 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.87
PatriotsFor 76Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 23Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 15Against 7Abst. 3No vote 5 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria600
Belgium300
Czechia900
Denmark100
Spain400
France2700
Hungary1000
Italy600
Latvia100
Netherlands500
Poland200
Portugal200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 584 members

No vote recorded, 135

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 135 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Sept 2025Amendment 402 to Article 6, paragraph 1, alinéa 1 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment194 for, 434 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriots, S&Dr · shared0.99 527 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 1 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseAmendment193 for, 431 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 528 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 1, adding text after recital C Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseAmendment201 for, 438 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 537 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
20 May 2026Amendment 10, adding text after recital D Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseAmendment187 for, 440 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 539 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 18 to paragraph 21 Discharge 2023: AgenciesAmendment188 for, 448 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 533 voters
20 Jan 2026Amendment 32, adding text after recital E The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companiesAmendment190 for, 450 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 550 voters
11 Mar 2026Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 24 European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026Amendment184 for, 441 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 518 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 87 to Article 7, paragraph 3 Establishing the Temporary Decarbonisation FundAmendment190 for, 459 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Greens, Patriotsr · shared0.98 542 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 81 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionAmendment190 for, 443 against, 19 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 539 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 2 to paragraph 1 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseAmendment192 for, 451 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 539 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 15, after paragraph 20 — Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime”. Vote, 18 December 2025. votingId 182975, reference 2025/2061(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-18/182975 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 18 December 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-18-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 18 December 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-18-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-12-18, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-12-18/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-12-18-182975,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 15, after paragraph 20 — Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-12-18},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-18/182975}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-18/182975},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 182975, reference 2025/2061(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-18-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-18-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-12-18 (CC BY 4.0)}
}