Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 14, after paragraph 18

Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime

Vote
Amendment 14, after paragraph 18
Result
199 for · 372 against · 4 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
18 December 2025, 12:10
More facts (6)
Position
vote 8 of 26 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
A10-0240/2025 – Jean-Marc Germain, Monika Hohlmeier – After § 18 – Am 14
Vote id
182974
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 199 for, 372 against, 4 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 35 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 37Abst. 0No vote 9 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 43Abst. 0No vote 10 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 100Abst. 0No vote 36 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 2Against 55Abst. 1No vote 17 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.92
EPPFor 15Against 131Abst. 1No vote 41 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.84
ECRFor 68Against 0Abst. 0No vote 11 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 76Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 23Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 15Against 6Abst. 2No vote 7 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria020
Belgium020
Czechia010
Germany0120
Denmark030
Spain020
Finland010
France040
Croatia010
Italy020
Lithuania010
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Netherlands050
Romania010
Sweden030
Slovenia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 575 members

No vote recorded, 144

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 144 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
16 Jun 2026Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 4 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment211 for, 440 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 528 voters
22 Oct 2025Amendment 135, adding text after paragraph 49 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAmendment209 for, 429 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by S&D, Greensr · shared0.98 523 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 19 to paragraph 45 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment202 for, 441 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.97 528 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Amendment 7 to paragraph 112 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment207 for, 410 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.97 516 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 50 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportAmendment201 for, 420 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by S&D, Membersr · shared0.97 518 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 20, adding text after Article 1 Market stability reserve for the buildings, road transport and additional sectorAmendment212 for, 418 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 525 voters
16 Jun 2026Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 4 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment211 for, 453 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 536 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 17, adding text after recital 6 Market stability reserve for the buildings, road transport and additional sectorAmendment218 for, 419 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 529 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 37 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section IIIAmendment208 for, 443 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.97 536 voters
19 Jun 2025Amendment 33, adding text after paragraph 2 Clean Industrial DealAmendment178 for, 383 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&D, Patriotsr · shared0.97 481 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 14, after paragraph 18 — Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime”. Vote, 18 December 2025. votingId 182974, reference 2025/2061(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-18/182974 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 18 December 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-18-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 18 December 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-18-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-12-18, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-12-18/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-12-18-182974,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 14, after paragraph 18 — Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-12-18},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-18/182974}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-18/182974},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 182974, reference 2025/2061(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-18-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-18-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-12-18 (CC BY 4.0)}
}