Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 8, after paragraph 5

Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime

Vote
Amendment 8, after paragraph 5
Decision
No. 5 of the sitting of 18 Dec 2025
Result
178 for · 393 against · 13 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
18 December 2025, 12:09
More facts (6)
Position
vote 2 of 26 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
A10-0240/2025 – Jean-Marc Germain, Monika Hohlmeier – After § 5 – Am 8
Text
Report A-10-2025-0240
Dossier
2025/2061(INI)
Vote id
182969
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 178 for, 393 against, 13 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 30 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 37Abst. 0No vote 9 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 43Abst. 0No vote 10 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 103Abst. 0No vote 33 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 60Abst. 0No vote 15 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 6Against 140Abst. 2No vote 40 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.92
ECRFor 61Against 2Abst. 6No vote 10 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.83
PatriotsFor 76Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 23Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 12Against 8Abst. 5No vote 5 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria600
Belgium300
Czechia900
Denmark100
Spain400
France2700
Hungary1000
Italy600
Latvia100
Netherlands500
Poland200
Portugal200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 584 members

No vote recorded, 135

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 135 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
19 Jun 2025Amendment 35 to paragraph 17 Clean Industrial DealAmendment170 for, 379 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by S&D, Patriotsr · shared0.98 473 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 11 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportAmendment192 for, 450 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.98 539 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 26 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment191 for, 472 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 552 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Amendment 24 to paragraph 19 Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Amendment189 for, 425 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.97 515 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 17 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment188 for, 457 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.97 536 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 76 A revamped long-term budget for the Union in a changing worldAmendment187 for, 437 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Members, Patriotsr · shared0.97 523 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 23, adding text after paragraph 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Amendment195 for, 422 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.97 522 voters
19 Jun 2025Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 2 Clean Industrial DealAmendment181 for, 386 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Greens, Patriotsr · shared0.97 491 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 76 A revamped long-term budget for the Union in a changing worldAmendment179 for, 439 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Members, Patriotsr · shared0.97 526 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 70 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportAmendment185 for, 447 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by S&D, Membersr · shared0.97 537 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-18/182969
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 8, after paragraph 5 — Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime”. Vote, 18 December 2025. votingId 182969, reference 2025/2061(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-18/182969 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 18 December 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-18-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 18 December 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-18-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-12-18, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-12-18/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-12-18-182969,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 8, after paragraph 5 — Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-12-18},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-18/182969}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-18/182969},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 182969, reference 2025/2061(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-18-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-18-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-12-18 (CC BY 4.0)}
}