Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 11 — part 2

Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania

Vote
Paragraph 11 — part 2
Decision
No. 7 of the sitting of 18 Dec 2025
Result
431 for · 110 against · 11 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
18 December 2025, 12:23
More facts (6)
Position
vote 10 of 18 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left, Greens · split vote: Greens
Official label
RC-B10-0571/2025 – § 11/2
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0585
Dossier
2025/3025(RSP)
Vote id
182920
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 431 for, 110 against, 11 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 78 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “those words”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 36Abst. 0No vote 10 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 2Against 39Abst. 1No vote 11 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.89
S&DFor 82Against 14Abst. 0No vote 40 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.78
RenewFor 55Against 1Abst. 1No vote 18 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
EPPFor 146Against 0Abst. 0No vote 42 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 63Against 0Abst. 2No vote 14 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
PatriotsFor 56Against 7Abst. 2No vote 20 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.79
ESNFor 17Against 2Abst. 3No vote 5 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.66
No groupFor 10Against 11Abst. 2No vote 7 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria100
Czechia010
Germany1211
France100
Hungary100
Poland200
Slovakia002

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 552 members

No vote recorded, 167

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 167 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
21 Jan 2026Recital C — part 2 Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2025Split vote518 for, 113 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.82 512 voters
20 May 2026Final vote on the draft Council decision EU-Uzbekistan Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation AgreementFinal493 for, 104 against, 45 abstained Adopted For 77 %r · shared0.82 508 voters
21 Jan 2026Paragraph 1 — part 2 Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2025Split vote506 for, 128 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 79 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.81 513 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
7 Oct 2025Final vote on the provisional agreement Revision of the Visa Suspension MechanismFinal518 for, 96 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 81 %r · shared0.80 493 voters
23 Oct 2024Paragraph 63 — part 9 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sectionsSplit vote506 for, 111 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 80 %r · shared0.79 493 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 116 + 117 + 316 + 1 (voted as one) to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment536 for, 100 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 83 %Requested by ESN, ECRr · shared0.78 509 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 63 to Article 2 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment514 for, 108 against, 11 abstained Adopted For 81 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.78 499 voters
10 Jul 2025Final vote Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 as regards obligations of economic operators concerning battery due diligence policiesFinal542 for, 97 against, 12 abstained Adopted For 83 %r · shared0.78 507 voters
18 May 2026Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the ECR Group — Attack against citizens in Modena Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group – Attack against citizens in ModenaOther355 for, 86 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 79 %r · shared0.78 353 voters
21 Jan 2025Final vote on the draft Council decision EU/Republic of Serbia agreement on operational activities carried out by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in the Republic of SerbiaFinal505 for, 90 against, 43 abstained Adopted For 79 %r · shared0.78 499 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 10 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-18/182920
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 11 — part 2 — Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania”. Vote, 18 December 2025. votingId 182920, reference 2025/3025(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-18/182920 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 18 December 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-18-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 18 December 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-18-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-12-18, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-12-18/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-12-18-182920,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 11 — part 2 — Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-12-18},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-18/182920}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-18/182920},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 182920, reference 2025/3025(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-18-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-18-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-12-18 (CC BY 4.0)}
}