Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 11 — part 1

Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania

Vote
Paragraph 11 — part 1
Decision
No. 7 of the sitting of 18 Dec 2025
Result
472 for · 61 against · 24 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
18 December 2025, 12:23
More facts (6)
Position
vote 9 of 18 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left, Greens · split vote: Greens
Official label
RC-B10-0571/2025 – § 11/1
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0585
Dossier
2025/3025(RSP)
Vote id
182919
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 472 for, 61 against, 24 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 85 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘and Frontex, in full respect of its mandate,’”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 4Against 30Abst. 1No vote 11 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.79
GreensFor 42Against 0Abst. 0No vote 11 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 97Against 0Abst. 0No vote 39 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 57Against 0Abst. 1No vote 17 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
EPPFor 147Against 1Abst. 0No vote 40 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 64Against 0Abst. 2No vote 13 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
PatriotsFor 54Against 0Abst. 11No vote 20 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.75
ESNFor 2Against 17Abst. 4No vote 4 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.61
No groupFor 5Against 13Abst. 5No vote 7 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria100
Cyprus100
Czechia001
Germany180
Spain010
France100
Greece011
Luxembourg001
Poland001
Slovakia131

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 557 members

No vote recorded, 162

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 162 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Jul 2025Final vote — text as a whole Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictionsFinal523 for, 75 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 85 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.91 487 voters
27 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 262 Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation AgreementSeparate vote518 for, 67 against, 25 abstained Adopted For 85 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.91 499 voters
27 Nov 2025Paragraph 258 — part 5 Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation AgreementSplit vote510 for, 67 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 84 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.91 496 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
27 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 260 Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation AgreementSeparate vote506 for, 71 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 83 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.90 494 voters
27 Nov 2025Paragraph 8 — part 2 EU position on the proposed plan and EU engagement towards a just and lasting peace for UkraineSplit vote460 for, 72 against, 34 abstained Adopted For 81 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.87 470 voters
27 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 257 Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation AgreementSeparate vote507 for, 72 against, 28 abstained Adopted For 84 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.86 497 voters
23 Jan 2025Separate vote on paragraph 4 Situation in Venezuela following the usurpation of the presidency on 10 January 2025Separate vote521 for, 66 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 87 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.86 489 voters
16 Sept 2026Final vote on the provisional agreement Simplification of intra-EU transfers of defence-related products and simplification of security and defence procurement (Omnibus V)Final549 for, 92 against, 27 abstained Adopted For 82 %r · shared0.84 516 voters
26 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 1, point e EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the ArcticSeparate vote532 for, 85 against, 46 abstained Adopted For 80 %r · shared0.83 529 voters
27 Nov 2025Paragraph 258 — part 1 Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation AgreementSplit vote504 for, 72 against, 28 abstained Adopted For 83 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.83 495 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 10 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-18/182919
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 11 — part 1 — Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania”. Vote, 18 December 2025. votingId 182919, reference 2025/3025(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-18/182919 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 18 December 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-18-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 18 December 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-18-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-12-18, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-12-18/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-12-18-182919,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 11 — part 1 — Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-12-18},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-18/182919}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-18/182919},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 182919, reference 2025/3025(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-18-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-18-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-12-18 (CC BY 4.0)}
}