Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Separate vote: paragraph 9

European Citizens’ Initiative ‘My voice, my choice: for safe and accessible abortion’

Vote
Separate vote: paragraph 9
Result
393 for · 194 against · 47 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
17 December 2025, 12:40
More facts (6)
Position
vote 16 of 53 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR · separate vote: EPP
Official label
B10-0558/2025 – § 9
Vote id
182732
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 393 for, 194 against, 47 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 62 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 41Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 48Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 115Against 1Abst. 2No vote 18 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
RenewFor 63Against 1Abst. 0No vote 11 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 81Against 53Abst. 28No vote 26 of 188Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.25
ECRFor 2Against 65Abst. 7No vote 5 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.82
PatriotsFor 28Against 45Abst. 4No vote 8 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.38
ESNFor 1Against 23Abst. 0No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 14Against 6Abst. 6No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

S&D members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria400
Belgium400
Bulgaria200
Cyprus100
Germany1300
Denmark200
Estonia200
Spain1900
Finland200
France900
Greece300
Croatia400
Hungary200
Italy1900
Lithuania200
Luxembourg100
Malta012
Netherlands400
Poland300
Portugal600
Romania700
Sweden500
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 634 members

No vote recorded, 85

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 85 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point u — part 2 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote338 for, 147 against, 66 abstained Adopted For 61 %Requested by Patriots, Greensr · shared0.89 506 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point u — part 6 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote357 for, 134 against, 53 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.88 498 voters
12 Feb 2026Recital M — part 3 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote332 for, 148 against, 48 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.88 484 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point u — part 5 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote343 for, 154 against, 59 abstained Adopted For 62 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.87 510 voters
21 May 2026Paragraph 49 — part 2 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapSplit vote358 for, 134 against, 30 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.87 467 voters
21 May 2026Recital R — part 2 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapSplit vote320 for, 152 against, 34 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.87 450 voters
21 May 2026Separate vote on paragraph 79 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapSeparate vote327 for, 154 against, 31 abstained Adopted For 64 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.87 457 voters
13 Nov 2025Recital D — part 2 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Split vote347 for, 170 against, 61 abstained Adopted For 60 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.85 536 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point r — part 2 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote343 for, 146 against, 68 abstained Adopted For 62 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.85 509 voters
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 70 — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote401 for, 185 against, 58 abstained Adopted For 62 %Requested by Greens, EPPr · shared0.85 577 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Separate vote: paragraph 9 — European Citizens’ Initiative ‘My voice, my choice: for safe and accessible abortion’”. Vote, 17 December 2025. votingId 182732, reference 2025/3007(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-17/182732 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 December 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 December 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-12-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-12-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-12-17-182732,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Separate vote: paragraph 9 — European Citizens’ Initiative ‘My voice, my choice: for safe and accessible abortion’}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-12-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-17/182732}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-17/182732},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 182732, reference 2025/3007(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-12-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}