Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Final vote on the motion for a resolution

Simplification of the content and presentation of information to be disclosed concerning environmentally sustainable activities and simplification of certain technical screening criteria for determining whether economic activities cause no significant harm to environmental objectives

Vote
Final vote on the motion for a resolution
Decision
No. 7 of the sitting of 17 Dec 2025
Result
230 for · 402 against · 28 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
17 December 2025, 12:28
More facts (7)
Effect
Objection failed — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 1 of 1 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left, Greens
Official label
B10-0566/2025 – Motion for a resolution
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0566
Dossier
2025/2806(DEA)
Vote id
182704
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 230 for, 402 against, 28 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 35 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Objection failed.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 42Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 48Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 126Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 53Abst. 15No vote 7 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.67
EPPFor 2Against 166Abst. 5No vote 15 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
ECRFor 0Against 75Abst. 0No vote 4 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 5Against 73Abst. 0No vote 7 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.90
ESNFor 0Against 24Abst. 0No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 7Against 11Abst. 8No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria010
Czechia010
Germany0150
France010
Hungary010
Lithuania010
Poland020
Slovakia020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 660 members

No vote recorded, 59

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 59 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Amendment 215 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment211 for, 423 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.95 597 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 217 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment210 for, 423 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.94 596 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 219 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment201 for, 426 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.94 598 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Amendment 212 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment209 for, 422 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.94 598 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 210 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment209 for, 425 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.94 597 voters
21 Oct 2024Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the Verts/ALE Group Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the Verts/ALE GroupOther164 for, 319 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 34 %r · shared0.94 441 voters
22 May 2025Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 2 Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023Amendment192 for, 374 against, 20 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.93 541 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 196 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment202 for, 428 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.93 602 voters
12 Feb 2026Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 10 Situation in Northeast Syria, the violence against civilians and the need to maintain a sustainable ceasefireAmendment180 for, 332 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.93 500 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 194 + 273 (voted as one) to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment210 for, 421 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by S&D, The Leftr · shared0.93 607 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 1 connection: The decision

The decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-17/182704
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Final vote on the motion for a resolution — Simplification of the content and presentation of information to be disclosed concerning environmentally sustainable activities and simplification of certain technical screening criteria for determining whether economic activities cause no significant harm to environmental objectives”. Vote, 17 December 2025. votingId 182704, reference 2025/2806(DEA). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-17/182704 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 December 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 December 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-12-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-12-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-12-17-182704,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Final vote on the motion for a resolution — Simplification of the content and presentation of information to be disclosed concerning environmentally sustainable activities and simplification of certain technical screening criteria for determining whether economic activities cause no significant harm to environmental objectives}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-12-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-17/182704}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-17/182704},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 182704, reference 2025/2806(DEA). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-12-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}