Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Final vote on the motion for a resolution

Genetically modified sugar beet KWS20-1

Vote
Final vote on the motion for a resolution
Decision
No. 12 of the sitting of 16 Dec 2025
Result
455 for · 169 against · 8 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
16 December 2025, 13:15
More facts (7)
Effect
Objection passed — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 1 of 1 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
B10-0559/2025 – Motion for a resolution
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0559
Dossier
2025/2959(RSP)
Vote id
182705
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 455 for, 169 against, 8 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 72 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Objection passed.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 40Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 47Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 116Against 0Abst. 3No vote 17 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
RenewFor 28Against 34Abst. 1No vote 12 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.31
EPPFor 56Against 109Abst. 4No vote 19 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.47
ECRFor 58Against 11Abst. 0No vote 10 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.76
PatriotsFor 63Against 13Abst. 0No vote 9 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.74
ESNFor 21Against 1Abst. 0No vote 5 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
No groupFor 26Against 1Abst. 0No vote 3 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium200
Czechia100
Germany1300
Denmark300
Spain200
Finland200
France400
Croatia100
Italy400
Lithuania100
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands500
Romania100
Sweden300
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 632 members

No vote recorded, 87

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 87 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
16 Dec 2025Final vote on the motion for a resolution Genetically modified maize NK603Final479 for, 173 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 73 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.97 628 voters
11 Feb 2026Final vote on the motion for a resolution Genetically modified cotton T304-40Final428 for, 156 against, 22 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.92 540 voters
11 Feb 2026Final vote on the motion for a resolution Genetically modified maize T25 (ACS-ZMØØ3-2)Final462 for, 169 against, 22 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.92 580 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
11 Feb 2026Final vote on the motion for a resolution Genetically modified soybean DBN-09004-6Final461 for, 169 against, 22 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.91 579 voters
11 Feb 2026Final vote on the motion for a resolution Genetically modified cotton GHB614 × LLCotton25Final463 for, 164 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.91 575 voters
25 Nov 2025Final vote on the motion for a resolution Genetically modified soybean MON 87708Final453 for, 179 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.90 583 voters
25 Nov 2025Final vote on the motion for a resolution Genetically modified oilseed rape MON 88302Final456 for, 166 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.90 580 voters
8 Jul 2026Final vote — text as a whole Genetically modified maize DP202216 x NK603 x DAS-40278-9 and its sub-combinations DP 202216 x NK603, DP202216 x DAS-40278-9Final417 for, 167 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.90 538 voters
16 Sept 2026Final vote on the motion for a resolution Genetically modified soybean MON 94313Final457 for, 184 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.89 571 voters
25 Nov 2025Final vote on the motion for a resolution Genetically modified cotton MON 88913Final452 for, 182 against, 13 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.89 581 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 1 connection: The decision

The decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-16/182705
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Final vote on the motion for a resolution — Genetically modified sugar beet KWS20-1”. Vote, 16 December 2025. votingId 182705, reference 2025/2959(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-16/182705 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 16 December 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-16-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 16 December 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-16-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-12-16, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-12-16/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-12-16-182705,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Final vote on the motion for a resolution — Genetically modified sugar beet KWS20-1}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-12-16},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-16/182705}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-16/182705},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 182705, reference 2025/2959(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-16-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-16-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-12-16 (CC BY 4.0)}
}