Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Proposal to reject the text

Corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements

Vote
Proposal to reject the text
Result
117 for · 540 against · 4 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
16 December 2025, 13:11
More facts (5)
Position
vote 1 of 38 on the decision
Official label
A10-0197/2025 – Jörgen Warborn – Proposal for rejection – Am 402
Vote id
182614
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 117 for, 540 against, 4 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 18 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 42Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 48Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 12Against 111Abst. 2No vote 11 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.83
RenewFor 0Against 66Abst. 0No vote 9 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 1Against 176Abst. 0No vote 11 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 1Against 72Abst. 1No vote 5 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
PatriotsFor 0Against 78Abst. 0No vote 7 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 23Abst. 0No vote 4 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 13Against 14Abst. 1No vote 2 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

S&D members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria050
Belgium210
Bulgaria110
Cyprus010
Germany0140
Denmark020
Estonia020
Spain1170
Finland020
France081
Greece030
Croatia040
Hungary020
Italy0210
Lithuania020
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Malta030
Netherlands301
Poland030
Portugal080
Romania090
Sweden500
Slovenia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 661 members

No vote recorded, 58

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 58 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Proposal to reject the text Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsRejection105 for, 529 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 16 %r · shared0.95 601 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 201 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment92 for, 545 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 14 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.89 603 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 176 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment94 for, 545 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.89 605 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Amendment 205 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment94 for, 532 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.89 598 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 199 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment92 for, 542 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 14 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.88 602 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 184 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment99 for, 533 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.88 603 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 185 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment96 for, 541 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.88 603 voters
12 Mar 2026Proposal to reject the text Calculation of emission credits for heavy-duty vehicles for the reporting periods of the years 2025 to 2029Rejection81 for, 473 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 14 %r · shared0.88 522 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 177 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment95 for, 543 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.88 601 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 183 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment99 for, 535 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.88 604 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
26 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Proposal to reject the text — Corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements”. Vote, 16 December 2025. votingId 182614, reference 2025/0045(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-16/182614 (retrieved 26 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 16 December 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-16-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 16 December 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-16-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-12-16, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-12-16/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-12-16-182614,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Proposal to reject the text — Corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-12-16},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-16/182614}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-16/182614},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 182614, reference 2025/0045(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-16-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-16-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-12-16 (CC BY 4.0)}
}