Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 71, after Article 19

Bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and the EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement for agricultural products

Vote
Amendment 71, after Article 19
Result
192 for · 446 against · 4 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
16 December 2025, 12:59
More facts (6)
Position
vote 60 of 70 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ESN
Official label
A10-0254/2025 – Gabriel Mato – After Article 19 – Am 71
Vote id
182603
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 192 for, 446 against, 4 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 30 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 3Against 38Abst. 0No vote 5 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.89
GreensFor 0Against 48Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 114Abst. 0No vote 22 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 1Against 66Abst. 0No vote 8 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 4Against 167Abst. 2No vote 15 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.95
ECRFor 67Against 8Abst. 0No vote 4 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.84
PatriotsFor 77Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 23Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 17Against 5Abst. 2No vote 6 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria010
Belgium020
Czechia010
Germany0140
Denmark030
Spain020
Finland020
France040
Croatia010
Italy040
Lithuania010
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Netherlands060
Romania010
Sweden030
Slovenia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 642 members

No vote recorded, 77

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 77 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 12 Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Amendment193 for, 428 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.95 564 voters
20 Jan 2026Amendment 28, adding text after paragraph 2 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companiesAmendment190 for, 454 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.95 602 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 24 to paragraph 33 Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience FacilityAmendment184 for, 454 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 588 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
20 Jan 2025Ordre du jour de mercredi — Demande du groupe PfE Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE GroupOther108 for, 313 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 25 %r · shared0.94 378 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 4 to paragraph 16 The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basinsAmendment197 for, 444 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.94 584 voters
31 Mar 2025Tuesday's agenda — Request by the PfE Group Final vote Tuesday's agenda – Request by the PfE GroupOther118 for, 326 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 26 %r · shared0.94 401 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 10 to paragraph 126 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment192 for, 418 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.94 560 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 4 to paragraph 15 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseAmendment184 for, 454 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.94 583 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 3 to recital F The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basinsAmendment198 for, 440 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.94 583 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 3 to paragraph 4 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseAmendment189 for, 440 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.94 578 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 71, after Article 19 — Bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and the EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement for agricultural products”. Vote, 16 December 2025. votingId 182603, reference 2025/0322(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-16/182603 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 16 December 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-16-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 16 December 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-16-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-12-16, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-12-16/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-12-16-182603,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 71, after Article 19 — Bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and the EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement for agricultural products}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-12-16},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-16/182603}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-16/182603},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 182603, reference 2025/0322(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-16-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-16-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-12-16 (CC BY 4.0)}
}