Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Tuesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group (tanker)

Tuesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group (tanker)

Vote
Tuesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group (tanker)
Decision
No. 3 of the sitting of 15 Dec 2025
Result
181 for · 261 against · 9 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
15 December 2025, 17:22
More facts (4)
Effect
Rejected — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 1 of 1 on the decision
Official label
Tuesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group (tanker)
Vote id
182687
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 181 for, 261 against, 9 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 40 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Rejected.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 31Against 0Abst. 0No vote 15 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 39Against 0Abst. 1No vote 13 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
S&DFor 85Against 1Abst. 0No vote 50 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
RenewFor 1Against 38Abst. 0No vote 36 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
EPPFor 1Against 117Abst. 5No vote 65 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
ECRFor 0Against 37Abst. 0No vote 42 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 0Against 60Abst. 0No vote 25 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 8Against 5Abst. 2No vote 12 of 27Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.30
No groupFor 16Against 3Abst. 1No vote 10 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria010
Germany610
Spain001
France100
Greece300
Luxembourg100
Romania010
Slovakia500

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 451 members

No vote recorded, 268

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 268 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
1 Apr 2025Amendment 33, adding text after recital 28 Macro-financial assistance to EgyptAmendment232 for, 389 against, 49 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.92 420 voters
18 Jun 2026Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 1 Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAmendment195 for, 353 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.92 361 voters
27 Nov 2025Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 9 Escalation of the war and the humanitarian catastrophe in SudanAmendment206 for, 365 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 35 %r · shared0.92 386 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Sept 2025Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAmendment219 for, 423 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.92 409 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 63 to paragraph 1, after point aj Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAmendment201 for, 411 against, 29 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.92 413 voters
21 May 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 17 The need to reduce work-related fatalitiesAmendment160 for, 296 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.91 312 voters
8 Jul 2025Amendment 5 to paragraph 34 EU-Greenland and Denmark Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement: Implementing Protocol 2025-2030 (Resolution)Amendment237 for, 436 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.91 431 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAmendment226 for, 414 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.91 408 voters
17 Jul 2024Wednesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left GroupOther149 for, 251 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 36 %r · shared0.91 279 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 64 to paragraph 5 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment200 for, 397 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.91 392 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 1 connection: The decision

The decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-15/182687
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Tuesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group (tanker) — Tuesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group (tanker)”. Vote, 15 December 2025. votingId 182687. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-15/182687 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 15 December 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-15-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 15 December 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-15-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-12-15, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-12-15/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-12-15-182687,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Tuesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group (tanker) — Tuesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group (tanker)}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-12-15},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-15/182687}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-15/182687},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 182687. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-15-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-15-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-12-15 (CC BY 4.0)}
}