Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the ESN Group (Australia and Bavaria)

Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the ESN Group (Australia and Bavaria)

Vote
Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the ESN Group (Australia and Bavaria)
Decision
No. 2 of the sitting of 15 Dec 2025
Result
130 for · 316 against · 3 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
15 December 2025, 17:19
More facts (4)
Effect
Rejected — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 1 of 1 on the decision
Official label
Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the ESN Group (Australia and Bavaria)
Vote id
182686
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 130 for, 316 against, 3 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 29 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Rejected.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 31Abst. 0No vote 15 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 40Abst. 0No vote 13 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 86Abst. 0No vote 50 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 41Abst. 0No vote 34 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 4Against 115Abst. 2No vote 67 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
ECRFor 37Against 0Abst. 0No vote 42 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 60Against 0Abst. 0No vote 25 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 15Against 0Abst. 0No vote 12 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 14Against 3Abst. 1No vote 12 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria100
Germany610
Spain100
France010
Greece010
Luxembourg100
Romania100
Slovakia401

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 449 members

No vote recorded, 270

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 270 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Amendment 64, adding text after paragraph 40 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Amendment203 for, 422 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.98 402 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 22 to paragraph 17 Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Amendment198 for, 417 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.98 396 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 1, adding text after recital C Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseAmendment201 for, 438 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 414 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 Dec 2025Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 17 Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regimeAmendment191 for, 387 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 385 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 3 to paragraph 77 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment196 for, 422 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.98 393 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 57, adding text after paragraph 12 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment206 for, 453 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&D, Patriotsr · shared0.98 417 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 10, adding text after recital D Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseAmendment187 for, 440 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 414 voters
25 Nov 2025Amendment 14 to paragraph 12 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedAmendment194 for, 439 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.97 415 voters
11 Sept 2025Amendment 6 to paragraph 27 Implementation and streamlining of EU internal market rules to strengthen the single marketAmendment197 for, 402 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 385 voters
19 Jun 2025Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 2 Clean Industrial DealAmendment181 for, 386 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Greens, Patriotsr · shared0.97 373 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 1 connection: The decision

The decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-15/182686
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the ESN Group (Australia and Bavaria) — Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the ESN Group (Australia and Bavaria)”. Vote, 15 December 2025. votingId 182686. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-15/182686 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 15 December 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-15-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 15 December 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-15-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-12-15, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-12-15/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-12-15-182686,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the ESN Group (Australia and Bavaria) — Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the ESN Group (Australia and Bavaria)}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-12-15},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-15/182686}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-12-15/182686},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 182686. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-15-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-12-15-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-12-15 (CC BY 4.0)}
}