Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 8 — part 2

EU position on the proposed plan and EU engagement towards a just and lasting peace for Ukraine

Vote
Paragraph 8 — part 2
Result
460 for · 72 against · 34 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
27 November 2025, 12:39
More facts (6)
Position
vote 22 of 37 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left · split vote: The Left
Official label
RC-B10-0545/2025 – § 8/2
Vote id
182344
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 460 for, 72 against, 34 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 81 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: ‘reiterates, given the current volatile security situation in Europe, the importance of maintaining a NATO and US military presence along the eastern flank as crucial for securing the region’s stability;’

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 2Against 26Abst. 4No vote 14 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.72
GreensFor 42Against 4Abst. 3No vote 4 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.79
S&DFor 94Against 0Abst. 6No vote 36 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.91
RenewFor 60Against 0Abst. 0No vote 15 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 142Against 0Abst. 0No vote 46 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 56Against 3Abst. 4No vote 16 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.83
PatriotsFor 57Against 6Abst. 11No vote 11 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.66
ESNFor 3Against 18Abst. 1No vote 5 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.73
No groupFor 4Against 15Abst. 5No vote 6 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium100
Czechia100
Germany1400
Denmark300
Spain012
Finland200
France400
Croatia100
Italy031
Lithuania100
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands600
Romania100
Sweden300
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 566 members

No vote recorded, 153

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 153 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
27 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 262 Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation AgreementSeparate vote518 for, 67 against, 25 abstained Adopted For 85 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.90 563 voters
27 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 260 Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation AgreementSeparate vote506 for, 71 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 83 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.90 559 voters
16 Sept 2026Final vote on the provisional agreement Simplification of intra-EU transfers of defence-related products and simplification of security and defence procurement (Omnibus V)Final549 for, 92 against, 27 abstained Adopted For 82 %r · shared0.89 520 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
27 Nov 2025Paragraph 258 — part 5 Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation AgreementSplit vote510 for, 67 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 84 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.89 560 voters
27 Nov 2025Paragraph 258 — part 1 Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation AgreementSplit vote504 for, 72 against, 28 abstained Adopted For 83 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.89 559 voters
27 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 257 Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation AgreementSeparate vote507 for, 72 against, 28 abstained Adopted For 84 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.89 562 voters
18 Jun 2026Final vote — text as a whole Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and FinlandFinal412 for, 63 against, 53 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.87 436 voters
27 Nov 2025Paragraph 251 — part 3 Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation AgreementSplit vote472 for, 64 against, 70 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.87 559 voters
18 Dec 2025Paragraph 11 — part 1 Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against LithuaniaSplit vote472 for, 61 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 85 %Requested by The Left, Greensr · shared0.87 470 voters
30 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Ensuring accountability and justice in response to Russia’s continued attacks against the civilian population in UkraineFinal446 for, 63 against, 52 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by Renew, EPPr · shared0.87 466 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 8 — part 2 — EU position on the proposed plan and EU engagement towards a just and lasting peace for Ukraine”. Vote, 27 November 2025. votingId 182344, reference 2025/3001(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-27/182344 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 27 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-27-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 27 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-27-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-27, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-11-27/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-11-27-182344,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 8 — part 2 — EU position on the proposed plan and EU engagement towards a just and lasting peace for Ukraine}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-11-27},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-27/182344}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-27/182344},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 182344, reference 2025/3001(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-27-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-27-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-27 (CC BY 4.0)}
}