Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 8 — part 1

EU position on the proposed plan and EU engagement towards a just and lasting peace for Ukraine

Vote
Paragraph 8 — part 1
Result
490 for · 44 against · 32 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
27 November 2025, 12:39
More facts (6)
Position
vote 21 of 37 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left · split vote: The Left
Official label
RC-B10-0545/2025 – § 8/1
Vote id
182343
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 490 for, 44 against, 32 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 87 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: ‘Recalls its position that the temporarily occupied Ukrainian territory will not be legally recognised by the EU and its Member States as Russian territory; highlights, moreover, that as part of robust international security guarantees and in order to prevent any future violations of Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, a robust international peacekeeping and observation mission should be deployed with a UN Security Council mandate on both sides of the line of contact;’

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 24Against 7Abst. 0No vote 15 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.66
GreensFor 46Against 0Abst. 2No vote 5 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
S&DFor 103Against 0Abst. 0No vote 33 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 63Against 0Abst. 0No vote 12 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 145Against 0Abst. 1No vote 42 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 58Against 3Abst. 3No vote 15 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.86
PatriotsFor 43Against 6Abst. 17No vote 19 of 85Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.48
ESNFor 3Against 18Abst. 1No vote 5 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.73
No groupFor 5Against 10Abst. 8No vote 7 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium300
Bulgaria500
Cyprus100
Czechia400
Germany2100
Denmark200
Estonia200
Spain1700
Finland300
France401
Greece200
Croatia300
Hungary300
Ireland400
Italy700
Lithuania300
Luxembourg200
Latvia100
Malta200
Netherlands500
Poland2200
Portugal600
Romania1000
Sweden500
Slovenia500
Slovakia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 566 members

No vote recorded, 153

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 153 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

The minority on this vote was under 10 % of the votes cast — too small to compare how it split the chamber.

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 8 — part 1 — EU position on the proposed plan and EU engagement towards a just and lasting peace for Ukraine”. Vote, 27 November 2025. votingId 182343, reference 2025/3001(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-27/182343 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 27 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-27-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 27 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-27-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-27, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-11-27/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-11-27-182343,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 8 — part 1 — EU position on the proposed plan and EU engagement towards a just and lasting peace for Ukraine}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-11-27},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-27/182343}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-27/182343},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 182343, reference 2025/3001(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-27-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-27-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-27 (CC BY 4.0)}
}