Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 7, after recital B

Escalation of the war and the humanitarian catastrophe in Sudan

Vote
Amendment 7, after recital B
Decision
No. 10 of the sitting of 27 Nov 2025
Result
70 for · 379 against · 143 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
27 November 2025, 12:32
More facts (5)
Position
vote 24 of 38 on the decision
Official label
RC-B10-0533/2025 – After recital B – Am 7
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0533
Dossier
2025/2984(RSP)
Vote id
182281
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 70 for, 379 against, 143 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 12 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 32Against 0Abst. 0No vote 14 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 7Against 0Abst. 43No vote 3 of 53Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.79
S&DFor 17Against 2Abst. 90No vote 27 of 136Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.74
RenewFor 2Against 60Abst. 0No vote 13 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.95
EPPFor 0Against 149Abst. 0No vote 39 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 0Against 65Abst. 2No vote 12 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
PatriotsFor 0Against 76Abst. 0No vote 9 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 1Against 21Abst. 0No vote 5 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
No groupFor 11Against 6Abst. 8No vote 5 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium200
Germany400
Denmark100
Spain200
Finland300
France700
Ireland200
Italy800
Portugal100
Sweden200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 592 members

No vote recorded, 127

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 127 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
21 May 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 17 The need to reduce work-related fatalitiesAmendment160 for, 296 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.89 416 voters
21 May 2026Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 21 The need to reduce work-related fatalitiesAmendment160 for, 300 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.88 418 voters
22 Jan 2026Amendment 5, adding text after recital A Presidential elections in Honduras, the non-recognition of the outcome by the incumbent administration and the attacks on opposition members of the National AssemblyAmendment215 for, 362 against, 39 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.87 518 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 May 2025Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 3 Competition policy – annual report 2024Amendment66 for, 368 against, 130 abstained Rejected For 12 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.87 477 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAmendment219 for, 423 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.87 547 voters
18 Jun 2026Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 1 Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAmendment195 for, 353 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.87 481 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 17 to paragraph 64 Public procurementAmendment224 for, 420 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.87 546 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAmendment224 for, 410 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.86 541 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 64 to paragraph 5 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment200 for, 397 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.86 506 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAmendment226 for, 414 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.86 544 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-27/182281
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 7, after recital B — Escalation of the war and the humanitarian catastrophe in Sudan”. Vote, 27 November 2025. votingId 182281, reference 2025/2984(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-27/182281 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 27 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-27-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 27 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-27-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-27, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-11-27/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-11-27-182281,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 7, after recital B — Escalation of the war and the humanitarian catastrophe in Sudan}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-11-27},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-27/182281}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-27/182281},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 182281, reference 2025/2984(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-27-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-27-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-27 (CC BY 4.0)}
}