Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 60 — part 2

EU strategy for the rights of persons with disabilities post-2024

Vote
Paragraph 60 — part 2
Decision
No. 8 of the sitting of 27 Nov 2025
Result
385 for · 168 against · 50 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
27 November 2025, 12:22
More facts (6)
Position
vote 23 of 41 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Renew, S&D · split vote: Members
Official label
A10-0211/2025 – Rosa Estaràs Ferragut – § 60/2
Text
Report A-10-2025-0211
Dossier
2025/2057(INI)
Vote id
182173
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 385 for, 168 against, 50 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 64 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “those words”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 34Against 2Abst. 0No vote 10 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.92
GreensFor 50Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 103Against 2Abst. 5No vote 26 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.90
RenewFor 46Against 15Abst. 1No vote 13 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.61
EPPFor 106Against 23Abst. 25No vote 34 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.53
ECRFor 22Against 45Abst. 0No vote 12 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.51
PatriotsFor 14Against 56Abst. 6No vote 9 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.61
ESNFor 0Against 18Abst. 4No vote 5 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.73
No groupFor 10Against 7Abst. 9No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria020
Czechia001
Germany0130
Hungary010
Lithuania001
Poland020
Slovakia002

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 603 members

No vote recorded, 116

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 116 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Dec 2025Paragraph 7 — part 2 Digitalisation, artificial intelligence and algorithmic management in the workplace – shaping the future of workSplit vote469 for, 136 against, 52 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.74 567 voters
9 Oct 2025Final vote — text as a whole Second World Summit for Social DevelopmentFinal360 for, 210 against, 37 abstained Adopted For 59 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.74 520 voters
21 May 2026Separate vote on recital AF Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapSeparate vote285 for, 198 against, 30 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.73 451 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 35 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategyAmendment400 for, 111 against, 67 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.73 499 voters
18 Jun 2025Recital G — part 2 Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience FacilitySplit vote418 for, 200 against, 35 abstained Adopted For 64 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.72 549 voters
17 Dec 2025Paragraph 16 — part 2 Digitalisation, artificial intelligence and algorithmic management in the workplace – shaping the future of workSplit vote471 for, 137 against, 49 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.71 568 voters
8 Oct 2025Paragraph 8 — part 2 Draft amending budget No 2/2025: update of revenue (own resources) and adjustments to expenditureSplit vote406 for, 181 against, 44 abstained Adopted For 64 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.71 533 voters
21 May 2026Paragraph 18 — part 2 The need to reduce work-related fatalitiesSplit vote303 for, 165 against, 5 abstained Adopted For 64 %Requested by The Left, Patriotsr · shared0.71 417 voters
18 Jun 2025Paragraph 19 — part 4 Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience FacilitySplit vote402 for, 238 against, 12 abstained Adopted For 62 %r · shared0.71 549 voters
11 Mar 2025Final vote — text as a whole European Social Fund Plus post-2027Final432 for, 155 against, 82 abstained Adopted For 65 %r · shared0.71 560 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-27/182173
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 60 — part 2 — EU strategy for the rights of persons with disabilities post-2024”. Vote, 27 November 2025. votingId 182173, reference 2025/2057(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-27/182173 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 27 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-27-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 27 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-27-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-27, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-11-27/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-11-27-182173,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 60 — part 2 — EU strategy for the rights of persons with disabilities post-2024}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-11-27},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-27/182173}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-27/182173},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 182173, reference 2025/2057(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-27-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-27-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-27 (CC BY 4.0)}
}