Skip to content

Vote · Final vote

Decision to maintain the action

Decision to maintain the action before the Court of Justice for the annulment of the decision of the Commission on the withdrawal of the Standard essential patents proposal

Vote
Decision to maintain the action
Result
334 for · 294 against · 11 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
25 November 2025, 12:24
More facts (3)
Effect
Adopted — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 1 of 1 on the decision
Vote id
181828
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 334 for, 294 against, 11 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 52 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Adopted.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 34Against 1Abst. 1No vote 10 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.92
GreensFor 49Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 116Against 6Abst. 0No vote 14 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
RenewFor 56Against 10Abst. 0No vote 9 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.77
EPPFor 30Against 129Abst. 5No vote 24 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.68
ECRFor 22Against 49Abst. 1No vote 7 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.52
PatriotsFor 6Against 72Abst. 1No vote 6 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.87
ESNFor 0Against 23Abst. 0No vote 4 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 21Against 4Abst. 3No vote 2 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium200
Cyprus100
Germany400
Denmark100
Spain200
Finland210
France700
Greece300
Ireland300
Italy800
Portugal001
Sweden100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 639 members

No vote recorded, 80

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 80 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
27 Nov 2025Amendment 16, adding text after recital F Escalation of the war and the humanitarian catastrophe in SudanAmendment262 for, 285 against, 42 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greens, S&Dr · shared0.79 556 voters
12 Feb 2026Separate vote on paragraph 17 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategySeparate vote247 for, 291 against, 43 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.78 526 voters
13 Mar 2025Paragraph 5 — part 2 Social and employment aspects of restructuring processes: the need to protect jobs and workers’ rightsSplit vote279 for, 313 against, 19 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.78 547 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Separate vote on paragraph 64 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategySeparate vote253 for, 317 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.77 525 voters
27 Nov 2025Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 19 Political situation in Myanmar including the humanitarian crisis of the RohingyaAmendment263 for, 291 against, 26 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.76 547 voters
27 Nov 2025Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 9 Escalation of the war and the humanitarian catastrophe in SudanAmendment272 for, 289 against, 32 abstained Rejected For 46 %r · shared0.76 560 voters
9 Jul 2025Paragraph 56 — part 2 Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political ForumSplit vote321 for, 317 against, 41 abstained Adopted For 47 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.76 605 voters
12 Feb 2026Separate vote on paragraph 65 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategySeparate vote253 for, 320 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.75 527 voters
17 Dec 2025Annex, paragraph 1 — part 2 Digitalisation, artificial intelligence and algorithmic management in the workplace – shaping the future of workSplit vote278 for, 374 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 42 %r · shared0.75 599 voters
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 101 — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote293 for, 343 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by Greens, EPPr · shared0.74 577 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Decision to maintain the action — Decision to maintain the action before the Court of Justice for the annulment of the decision of the Commission on the withdrawal of the Standard essential patents proposal”. Vote, 25 November 2025. votingId 181828. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-25/181828 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 25 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-25-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 25 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-25-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-25, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-11-25/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-11-25-181828,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Decision to maintain the action — Decision to maintain the action before the Court of Justice for the annulment of the decision of the Commission on the withdrawal of the Standard essential patents proposal}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-11-25},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-25/181828}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-25/181828},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 181828. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-25-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-25-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-25 (CC BY 4.0)}
}