Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 286 to recital 24

Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements

Vote
Amendment 286 to recital 24
Decision
No. 3 of the sitting of 13 Nov 2025
Result
294 for · 337 against · 9 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
13 November 2025, 11:49
More facts (6)
Position
vote 313 of 320 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR
Official label
A10-0197/2025 – Jörgen Warborn – Recital 24 – Am 286
Text
Report A-10-2025-0197
Dossier
2025/0045(COD)
Vote id
181196
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 294 for, 337 against, 9 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 46 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 40Abst. 0No vote 6 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 47Abst. 0No vote 6 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 2Against 120Abst. 0No vote 14 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
RenewFor 6Against 57Abst. 0No vote 12 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.86
EPPFor 169Against 2Abst. 1No vote 16 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
ECRFor 72Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 15Against 61Abst. 0No vote 8 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.70
ESNFor 18Against 0Abst. 5No vote 4 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.67
No groupFor 12Against 10Abst. 3No vote 5 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria020
Belgium020
Czechia010
Germany0130
Denmark030
Spain030
Finland010
France050
Croatia010
Italy030
Lithuania010
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Netherlands060
Sweden030
Slovenia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 640 members

No vote recorded, 78

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 78 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
26 Nov 2025Amendments 109 + 23 (voted as one) to recital 14 Deforestation Regulation: certain obligations of operators and tradersAmendment295 for, 357 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 45 %r · shared0.86 601 voters
11 Feb 2025Amendment 6 to paragraph 28 European Central Bank – annual report 2024Amendment316 for, 286 against, 42 abstained Adopted For 49 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.83 570 voters
17 Jun 2026Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 63 2025 Commission report on KosovoAmendment252 for, 305 against, 89 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.82 580 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
27 Nov 2025Amendment 1 to paragraph 87 EU strategy for the rights of persons with disabilities post-2024Amendment287 for, 259 against, 58 abstained Adopted For 48 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.82 555 voters
9 Oct 2025Amendment 2 to paragraph 9 Second World Summit for Social DevelopmentAmendment285 for, 238 against, 91 abstained Adopted For 46 %Requested by EPP, S&Dr · shared0.82 556 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 29 to paragraph 11 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment342 for, 310 against, 22 abstained Adopted For 51 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.81 601 voters
28 Nov 2024Amendment 19 to paragraph 12 Recommendation on smoke- and aerosol-free environmentsAmendment268 for, 270 against, 35 abstained Rejected For 47 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.80 517 voters
28 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2024Final231 for, 389 against, 33 abstained Rejected For 35 %r · shared0.79 587 voters
28 Nov 2024Amendment 17 to paragraph 6 Recommendation on smoke- and aerosol-free environmentsAmendment253 for, 298 against, 23 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.79 518 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 1 to paragraph 45 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Court of AuditorsAmendment258 for, 323 against, 80 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.78 588 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-13/181196
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 286 to recital 24 — Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements”. Vote, 13 November 2025. votingId 181196, reference 2025/0045(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-13/181196 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 13 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-13-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 13 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-13-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-13, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-11-13/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-11-13-181196,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 286 to recital 24 — Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-11-13},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-13/181196}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-13/181196},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 181196, reference 2025/0045(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-13-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-13-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-13 (CC BY 4.0)}
}