Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 212 to article 4

Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements

Vote
Amendment 212 to article 4
Decision
No. 3 of the sitting of 13 Nov 2025
Result
209 for · 422 against · 6 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
13 November 2025, 11:42
More facts (6)
Position
vote 267 of 320 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
A10-0197/2025 – Jörgen Warborn – Article 4 – § 1 – point 12 – point c; Article 29 – paragraph 3 – point d – Am 212S
Text
Report A-10-2025-0197
Dossier
2025/0045(COD)
Vote id
181172
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 209 for, 422 against, 6 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 33 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 40Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 46Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 116Against 1Abst. 1No vote 18 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
RenewFor 1Against 62Abst. 0No vote 12 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 2Against 170Abst. 1No vote 15 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
ECRFor 1Against 71Abst. 0No vote 7 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 0Against 77Abst. 0No vote 7 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 23Abst. 0No vote 4 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 3Against 18Abst. 4No vote 5 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria010
Germany0140
France010
Hungary010
Lithuania010
Poland030
Slovakia020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 637 members

No vote recorded, 81

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 81 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Sept 2026Amendment 69 to paragraph 13 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.95 524 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 2 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment203 for, 390 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.95 536 voters
21 Oct 2024Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the Verts/ALE Group Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the Verts/ALE GroupOther164 for, 319 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 34 %r · shared0.95 434 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Sept 2026Amendment 60, adding text after recital C The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.94 524 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 64 to paragraph 5 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment200 for, 397 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.94 535 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.94 531 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 5 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment201 for, 390 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.94 536 voters
17 Dec 2025Final vote on the motion for a resolution Simplification of the content and presentation of information to be disclosed concerning environmentally sustainable activities and simplification of certain technical screening criteria for determining whether economic activities cause no significant harm to environmental objectivesFinal230 for, 402 against, 28 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Left, Greensr · shared0.94 598 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.94 526 voters
12 Mar 2026Amendment 37 to paragraph 16 Activities of the European Ombudsman – annual report 2024Amendment185 for, 364 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.94 510 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-13/181172
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 212 to article 4 — Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements”. Vote, 13 November 2025. votingId 181172, reference 2025/0045(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-13/181172 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 13 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-13-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 13 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-13-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-13, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-11-13/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-11-13-181172,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 212 to article 4 — Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-11-13},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-13/181172}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-13/181172},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 181172, reference 2025/0045(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-13-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-13-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-13 (CC BY 4.0)}
}