Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendments 186 + 387 (voted as one) to article 4

Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements

Vote
Amendments 186 + 387 (voted as one) to article 4
Result
223 for · 416 against · 4 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
13 November 2025, 11:34
More facts (6)
Position
vote 219 of 320 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens, The Left, Patriots
Official label
A10-0197/2025 – Jörgen Warborn – Article 4 – § 1 – point 6; Article 11 – paragraph 7 – § 1 – point a – Am 186S 387S
Vote id
181132
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 223 for, 416 against, 4 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 35 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 40Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 45Abst. 1No vote 7 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 2Against 121Abst. 0No vote 13 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
RenewFor 0Against 64Abst. 0No vote 11 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 1Against 173Abst. 0No vote 14 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 70Against 2Abst. 0No vote 7 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
PatriotsFor 76Against 1Abst. 0No vote 7 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
ESNFor 22Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 12Against 10Abst. 3No vote 5 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria020
Belgium010
Czechia010
Germany0130
Denmark030
Spain030
Finland010
France050
Croatia010
Italy021
Lithuania010
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Netherlands060
Sweden030
Slovenia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 643 members

No vote recorded, 75

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 75 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Jul 2025Final vote on the motion for a resolution Motion of censure on the CommissionFinal175 for, 360 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 32 %r · shared0.91 495 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 3 Discharge 2023: European Public Prosecutor’s OfficeAmendment209 for, 413 against, 38 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.89 587 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 88, adding text after paragraph 21 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034Amendment230 for, 408 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.89 588 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 May 2025Amendment 1 to paragraph 1 Banking Union – annual report 2024Amendment180 for, 346 against, 28 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ECR, ESNr · shared0.86 497 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 91, adding text after paragraph 183 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment225 for, 387 against, 28 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.86 571 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 224 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment248 for, 352 against, 54 abstained Rejected For 38 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.86 582 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 36, adding text after paragraph 251 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment251 for, 354 against, 49 abstained Rejected For 38 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.85 582 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 3 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment203 for, 417 against, 20 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.85 572 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 92 to paragraph 48 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldAmendment217 for, 427 against, 19 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.84 590 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 85 to paragraph 49 Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2024Amendment263 for, 374 against, 31 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.84 599 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendments 186 + 387 (voted as one) to article 4 — Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements”. Vote, 13 November 2025. votingId 181132, reference 2025/0045(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-13/181132 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 13 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-13-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 13 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-13-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-13, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-11-13/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-11-13-181132,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendments 186 + 387 (voted as one) to article 4 — Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-11-13},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-13/181132}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-13/181132},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 181132, reference 2025/0045(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-13-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-13-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-13 (CC BY 4.0)}
}