Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 185 to article 4

Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements

Vote
Amendment 185 to article 4
Decision
No. 3 of the sitting of 13 Nov 2025
Result
96 for · 541 against · 5 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
13 November 2025, 11:34
More facts (6)
Position
vote 216 of 320 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
A10-0197/2025 – Jörgen Warborn – Article 4 – § 1 – point 6; Article 11 – paragraph 7 – § 1 – introductory part – Am 185S
Text
Report A-10-2025-0197
Dossier
2025/0045(COD)
Vote id
181130
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 96 for, 541 against, 5 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 15 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 40Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 47Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 2Against 122Abst. 0No vote 12 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
RenewFor 0Against 62Abst. 0No vote 13 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 2Against 168Abst. 1No vote 17 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
ECRFor 0Against 73Abst. 0No vote 6 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 0Against 77Abst. 0No vote 7 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 3Against 19Abst. 1No vote 4 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.74
No groupFor 2Against 20Abst. 3No vote 5 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria050
Belgium030
Bulgaria050
Cyprus010
Czechia050
Germany1270
Denmark020
Estonia020
Spain0200
Finland130
France060
Greece060
Croatia060
Hungary050
Ireland040
Italy070
Lithuania030
Luxembourg020
Latvia020
Malta020
Netherlands050
Poland0211
Portugal060
Romania090
Sweden050
Slovenia050
Slovakia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 642 members

No vote recorded, 76

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 76 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 Jul 2026Amendment 35, adding text after paragraph 50 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment94 for, 559 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 14 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.94 588 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 71 to paragraph 14 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment92 for, 496 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.94 529 voters
12 Mar 2026Proposal to reject the text Calculation of emission credits for heavy-duty vehicles for the reporting periods of the years 2025 to 2029Rejection81 for, 473 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 14 %r · shared0.92 510 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Sept 2026Amendment 65 to paragraph 7 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.92 537 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 55 to recital C The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment95 for, 486 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.92 526 voters
12 Mar 2026Amendment 4 to Annex, point a Calculation of emission credits for heavy-duty vehicles for the reporting periods of the years 2025 to 2029Amendment81 for, 468 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.92 510 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 56 to recital D The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.92 522 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 124 to Article 19, After paragraph 1 (corresponds to Article 22 in am 120) Generalised scheme of tariff preferencesAmendment95 for, 551 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.91 588 voters
12 Mar 2026Amendment 5 to Annex, point b Calculation of emission credits for heavy-duty vehicles for the reporting periods of the years 2025 to 2029Amendment81 for, 466 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.91 510 voters
31 Mar 2025Tuesday's agenda — Request by the Verts/ALE Group Final vote Tuesday's agenda – Request by the Verts/ALE GroupOther82 for, 357 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 18 %r · shared0.90 412 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-13/181130
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 185 to article 4 — Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements”. Vote, 13 November 2025. votingId 181130, reference 2025/0045(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-13/181130 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 13 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-13-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 13 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-13-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-13, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-11-13/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-11-13-181130,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 185 to article 4 — Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-11-13},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-13/181130}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-13/181130},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 181130, reference 2025/0045(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-13-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-13-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-13 (CC BY 4.0)}
}