Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 96 to article 4

Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements

Vote
Amendment 96 to article 4
Decision
No. 3 of the sitting of 13 Nov 2025
Result
464 for · 172 against · 6 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
13 November 2025, 11:33
More facts (6)
Position
vote 210 of 320 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
A10-0197/2025 – Jörgen Warborn – Article 4 – § 1 – point 5; Article 10 – paragraph 6 – § 3 – Am 96
Text
Report A-10-2025-0197
Dossier
2025/0045(COD)
Vote id
181125
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 464 for, 172 against, 6 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 72 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 40Abst. 0No vote 6 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 47Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 119Against 4Abst. 0No vote 13 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
RenewFor 63Against 0Abst. 0No vote 12 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 171Against 1Abst. 0No vote 16 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 3Against 69Abst. 0No vote 7 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
PatriotsFor 28Against 49Abst. 0No vote 7 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.45
ESNFor 22Against 1Abst. 0No vote 4 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
No groupFor 11Against 8Abst. 6No vote 5 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria500
Belgium300
Bulgaria500
Cyprus100
Czechia500
Germany2700
Denmark200
Estonia200
Spain2000
Finland400
France600
Greece510
Croatia600
Hungary500
Ireland400
Italy700
Lithuania300
Luxembourg200
Latvia200
Malta200
Netherlands600
Poland2100
Portugal700
Romania1000
Sweden500
Slovenia500
Slovakia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 642 members

No vote recorded, 76

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 76 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 May 2025Amendment 100 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment370 for, 196 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 64 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.80 518 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 118 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment371 for, 194 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.80 514 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 122 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment378 for, 191 against, 2 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.79 513 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 May 2025Amendment 116 to Article 7, paragraph 9 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment369 for, 199 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 64 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.79 518 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 123 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment376 for, 195 against, 2 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.78 515 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 119 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment357 for, 206 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by Patriots, Greensr · shared0.77 512 voters
11 Mar 2026Final vote — text as a whole European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026Final392 for, 219 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 62 %r · shared0.77 568 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 120 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment361 for, 209 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.76 519 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 121 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment358 for, 208 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 62 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.76 515 voters
7 May 2025Final vote Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsFinal412 for, 245 against, 5 abstained Adopted For 62 %r · shared0.75 590 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-13/181125
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 96 to article 4 — Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements”. Vote, 13 November 2025. votingId 181125, reference 2025/0045(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-13/181125 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 13 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-13-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 13 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-13-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-13, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-11-13/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-11-13-181125,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 96 to article 4 — Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-11-13},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-13/181125}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-13/181125},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 181125, reference 2025/0045(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-13-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-13-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-13 (CC BY 4.0)}
}