Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 92 to article 4

Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements

Vote
Amendment 92 to article 4
Decision
No. 3 of the sitting of 13 Nov 2025
Result
573 for · 57 against · 11 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
13 November 2025, 11:31
More facts (6)
Position
vote 197 of 320 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
A10-0197/2025 – Jörgen Warborn – Article 4 – § 1 – point 4 – point d; Article 8 – paragraph 5 – Am 92
Text
Report A-10-2025-0197
Dossier
2025/0045(COD)
Vote id
181115
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 573 for, 57 against, 11 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 89 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 40Abst. 0No vote 6 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 38Against 9Abst. 0No vote 6 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.71
S&DFor 121Against 1Abst. 0No vote 14 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 62Against 2Abst. 0No vote 11 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
EPPFor 172Against 1Abst. 0No vote 15 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 72Against 1Abst. 0No vote 6 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 75Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 19Against 1Abst. 2No vote 5 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.80
No groupFor 14Against 2Abst. 9No vote 5 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria500
Belgium300
Bulgaria500
Cyprus100
Czechia500
Germany2610
Denmark200
Estonia200
Spain2000
Finland400
France600
Greece600
Croatia600
Hungary500
Ireland400
Italy700
Lithuania300
Luxembourg200
Latvia200
Malta200
Netherlands600
Poland2200
Portugal700
Romania1000
Sweden500
Slovenia500
Slovakia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 641 members

No vote recorded, 77

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 77 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

The minority on this vote was under 10 % of the votes cast — too small to compare how it split the chamber.

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-13/181115
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 92 to article 4 — Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements”. Vote, 13 November 2025. votingId 181115, reference 2025/0045(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-13/181115 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 13 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-13-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 13 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-13-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-13, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-11-13/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-11-13-181115,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 92 to article 4 — Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-11-13},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-13/181115}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-13/181115},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 181115, reference 2025/0045(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-13-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-13-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-13 (CC BY 4.0)}
}