Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 91 to article 4

Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements

Vote
Amendment 91 to article 4
Decision
No. 3 of the sitting of 13 Nov 2025
Result
577 for · 57 against · 3 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
13 November 2025, 11:31
More facts (6)
Position
vote 194 of 320 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
A10-0197/2025 – Jörgen Warborn – Article 4 – § 1 – point 4 – point c; Article 8 – paragraph 4 – Am 91
Text
Report A-10-2025-0197
Dossier
2025/0045(COD)
Vote id
181113
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 577 for, 57 against, 3 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 91 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 40Abst. 0No vote 6 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 47Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 119Against 4Abst. 0No vote 13 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
RenewFor 58Against 5Abst. 0No vote 12 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
EPPFor 170Against 0Abst. 0No vote 18 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 71Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 77Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 22Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 13Against 8Abst. 3No vote 6 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium200
Czechia100
Germany1300
Denmark300
Spain300
Finland100
France500
Croatia100
Italy300
Lithuania100
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands600
Sweden300
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 637 members

No vote recorded, 81

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 81 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

The minority on this vote was under 10 % of the votes cast — too small to compare how it split the chamber.

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-13/181113
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 91 to article 4 — Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements”. Vote, 13 November 2025. votingId 181113, reference 2025/0045(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-13/181113 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 13 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-13-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 13 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-13-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-13, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-11-13/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-11-13-181113,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 91 to article 4 — Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-11-13},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-13/181113}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-13/181113},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 181113, reference 2025/0045(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-13-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-13-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-13 (CC BY 4.0)}
}