Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 82 to article 4

Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements

Vote
Amendment 82 to article 4
Decision
No. 3 of the sitting of 13 Nov 2025
Result
248 for · 378 against · 11 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
13 November 2025, 11:28
More facts (6)
Position
vote 173 of 320 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
A10-0197/2025 – Jörgen Warborn – Article 4 – § 1 – point 2; Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point n – Am 82
Text
Report A-10-2025-0197
Dossier
2025/0045(COD)
Vote id
181099
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 248 for, 378 against, 11 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 39 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 40Abst. 0No vote 6 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 47Abst. 0No vote 6 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 8Against 113Abst. 0No vote 15 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.90
RenewFor 62Against 0Abst. 0No vote 13 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 170Against 2Abst. 0No vote 16 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
ECRFor 2Against 71Abst. 0No vote 6 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
PatriotsFor 0Against 76Abst. 0No vote 8 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 21Abst. 2No vote 4 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.87
No groupFor 6Against 8Abst. 9No vote 7 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria010
Germany0140
France001
Hungary010
Lithuania001
Poland030
Slovakia020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 637 members

No vote recorded, 81

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 81 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Mar 2026Amendment 26 to paragraph 17 Activities of the European Ombudsman – annual report 2024Amendment225 for, 325 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 40 %Requested by Patriots, EPPr · shared0.86 509 voters
21 Oct 2025Final vote Standing Forest and Forestry Expert GroupFinal327 for, 256 against, 58 abstained Adopted For 51 %r · shared0.71 578 voters
22 Jan 2026Final vote — text as a whole Choice of performance indicators for audit and budgetary control in the context of financing measures to support the implementation of future European competitivenessFinal318 for, 247 against, 67 abstained Adopted For 50 %r · shared0.70 565 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
7 Jul 2026Final vote — text as a whole Financial activities of the European Investment Bank Group – annual report 2025Final316 for, 281 against, 39 abstained Adopted For 50 %r · shared0.70 558 voters
23 Jan 2025Paragraph 5 — part 2 Situation in Venezuela following the usurpation of the presidency on 10 January 2025Split vote322 for, 249 against, 36 abstained Adopted For 53 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.67 543 voters
17 Dec 2025Paragraph 23 — part 2 European Defence Readiness 2030: assessment of needsSplit vote335 for, 243 against, 70 abstained Adopted For 52 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.67 586 voters
22 Jan 2026Recital J — part 2 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote327 for, 235 against, 42 abstained Adopted For 54 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.66 542 voters
21 Oct 2025Referral back to committee Standing Forest and Forestry Expert GroupProcedural352 for, 242 against, 40 abstained Adopted For 56 %r · shared0.65 571 voters
23 Jan 2025Paragraph 2 — part 2 Situation in Venezuela following the usurpation of the presidency on 10 January 2025Split vote321 for, 219 against, 66 abstained Adopted For 53 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.65 540 voters
18 Jun 2026Final vote — text as a whole Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaFinal283 for, 199 against, 85 abstained Adopted For 50 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.65 503 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-13/181099
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 82 to article 4 — Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements”. Vote, 13 November 2025. votingId 181099, reference 2025/0045(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-13/181099 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 13 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-13-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 13 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-13-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-13, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-11-13/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-11-13-181099,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 82 to article 4 — Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-11-13},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-13/181099}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-13/181099},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 181099, reference 2025/0045(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-13-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-13-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-13 (CC BY 4.0)}
}